These two are the main proponents against the right of women to choose what happens to and in their body, but I could list hundreds of thousands upon millions more. Guess what!?! They are all wrong!!!
Before I go any further in dismantling the aforementioned in their poorly worded and crafted arguments, let me give you a short list (it could be extremely long, the following are most important):
I am not going to get into the nuisances of this debate that is largely emotively based. Therefore, I will dispense with all the tit for tat and just present the facts:
Personal liberty (legal definition): "the right a person has to behave as they like, subject only to interference for appropriate government reasons (such as the protection of other citizens' liberties)." "Liberty is the right of a person to do as they please, assuming their actions do not violate any laws or infringe on the rights of others. What is personal liberty? Personal liberty's definition is the right of individuals to be free of arbitrary restraint or bondage. In short, personal liberty allows people to live as they choose without interference from others unless it is for a good, legally-established reason." A pregnancy is not [a] person with all the rights, privileges and equal protection of the laws bestowed upon actual persons upon their birth. The pregnant girl/woman is [a] person. A pregnancy is not. It's even codified into law, the definition of what [a] person, human being, child and individual shall be understood to mean. 1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant
(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
(b) As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section.
(Added Pub. L. 107–207, § 2(a), Aug. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 926.)
Facts do not care about anyone's feelings. Pregnant girls/women have all the personal liberty to do as they choose with their body and what is occurring to it or within it. A pregnancy has no legal standing/rights.
94% of ALL abortions take place BEFORE 14 weeks gestation, the majority of those being BEFORE 6 weeks gestation. Absolutely. Positively. NO BABY involved. Now having said that, let me get into some explanation of linguistics.
Words have meaning. That meaning is defined by the context in which they are given. Semantics matters. Syntax matters. When you use words out of context, out of syntax, and semantically incorrect...you end with emotively charged terms based on a perverted context in which they are given. As a result, many words are used as misnomers and many are also conflated with others, albeit incorrectly. Terms like baby, child, children...the "pro-life" crowd never, ever uses the scientifically accurate terminology of any of the stages of pregnancy. Be it biology, psychology, legally, or reproductively. They are too truthful, too dry and meaningless for them because they cannot handle the truth of it all.
The obvious ignorant (uneducated) #prolife bandwagon considers #conception = to [a] #humanlife or [a] #humanbeing. Problem with that statement is, #cellularlife does NOT equal #ahumanbeing or #personhood.
FACT: #Potentiality does NOT = #Actuality. Never has. Never will.
Cellular life (i.e., conception), the basic biological criteria for #life, is merely potentiality. Without #viability (capable of extrauterine survival), the pregnancy is immaterial. It will not exist until it gestates long enough within the female #womb, period.
Again, 94% of ALL abortions are BEFORE 14 weeks, and viability is technically 19-20 weeks. Less than 1.2% of ALL abortions are AFTER 22-24 weeks. So, the whole "baby killers" argument is unsubstantiated uneducated nonsense. While there are some late term abortions, they are far, few and between (the noted 1.2%).
Since abortion was legalized with Roe v Wade, crime reduced because there were fewer degenerates being born into the criminal world. That is just an established fact, beyond any reasonable doubt.
While the following will be controversial, the fact remains, that since civil rights, the out of wedlock birthrate for black girls and women have risen exponentially from 20% to 72%, abortion has become a saving grace for many aspiring black girls and women in this country.
Ever since Lindon B. Johnson signed off on the War on Poverty, he forced black women to marry the United States Government rather than the black (or other) fathers of their seeded children.
As a result, half of the black male unfathered population have been committing over 50% of the violent person crimes in the United States, year after year. Murder. Non-Negligent Manslaughter. Robberies. Over representation in rapes. Half the black male population are not victims of #whitesupremacy, #whiteprivilege, or #white #racism. But rather black induced #victimhood #mentality.
Abortion serves a purpose beyond the asinine assertions of Margret Sanger. BUT and I mean BUT, it does not change the fact that eugenics does in fact serve a legitimate purpose.
Eugenics is a reality that existed long before Margret Sanger, and as such, some intelligent peoples have deduced that it has actual merit. Merit that has come to fruition to present day. The denial of eugenics has resulted in a fruition of actual degenerates, mentally ill, drug
addicts, and a huge cohort of criminals that came out of the woodwork like cockroaches seen in masse during the #BLM and #ANTIFA riots over the past couple years.
Back to basics. Fertility clinics and Mother Nature have one thing in common: #miscarriage. The aggregate number the former equals if not exceeds the number of abortions girls and/or women seek in any given year.
So according to the sycophants that want to force little girls and women to undergo a life changing procreation experience, and often to the detriment of their mortality, they merely want to see the pregnancy to fruition. Afterwards, they don't care. They just don't care. All that responsibility is thrusted upon the birthing mother who didn't even want the unwanted child to being with.
You see all these clowns hollering, yelling, screaming, and protesting that abortion is wrong BUT not a single one of them will take any personal accountability or responsibility for the children they force a woman to give birth to are the true #hypocrites. FACT!
Then when those children become a part of the juvenile, and then subsequent adult career criminal element, they bitch about government not doing enough to curb the problem.
Get it now???
Again. While fertilization, or conception, meets the very basic biological criterial for cellular life, that cellular life simply does not equal an actual #humanbeing. It just doesn't; as potentiality can never equal actuality. And yet the pro-life crowd keeps using incorrect terminology, misnomers, to describe accurately labeled stages of human reproductive development of a pregnancy. Baby this, baby that.
A zygote is NOT a baby.
A blastocyst is NOT a baby.
An embryo is NOT a baby.
An unviable fetus is NOT a baby.
An initial heartbeat does NOT equal a baby either. A heartbeat only means that an albeit immature organ (not entirely fully developed) is functional. Take the embryo/fetus out of the womb too early (before 19-22 weeks), and it will cease to exist. That being said, #viability is the ONLY issue that should concern anyone where a pregnancy is concerned. This proves why 94% of ALL abortions are before 14 weeks gestation, the majority of those being before 6 weeks. NO girl or woman wants to be responsible for the outright death of a viable fetus (i.e., if viable, an actual "baby"). Despite viability, the pregnancy still has no legal rights outside of Roe v Wade (i.e. - prohibition of late term abortions for mere contraceptive purposes).
Yes, many come back at me with the laws concerning double homicide of a pregnant woman; yet the fact remains that both the state and federal laws written of same categorize or ascribe the label of "legal victim" to the pregnancy, regardless of stage, and never that of [a] human being. The legislators knew that to state otherwise would immediately conflict with established case law (precedence) and Roe v Wade; not to mention the 14th Amendment of the Bill of Rights. So that argument is dead in the water (pardon the pun).
The undeniable fact remains, that without fetal #viability there can be NO actualized "human being."
Comments