Search Results

"The Republican Party...and being a party of progress they determined to incorporate into the Constitution of the United States an amendment, that should define American citizenship - white and black, native and foreign born, in unmistakable terms, and for all time. That was the origin of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Let us look at the language of that amendment, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Mark you then: "all person," no matter what their color, black or white, blonde or brunette - no matter where born, native or naturalized: The Constitution says, "all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens thereof, and of the States wherein they reside." That is the affirmative part of the amendment." ... "Fellow-citizens, that amendment was passed in Congress by the Republican vote, with every Democratic vote opposed. It was passed in three-fourths of the State Legislatures, with every Republican vote in every Legislature in favor of it, and every Democratic vote in every Legislature opposed to it, and to this hour there has never been in any convention of the Democratic party, National, State, county, or district, a single declaration so far as I have seen agreeing to abide by and enforce that amendment." - pg. 141 "...in a Republic where suffrage is universal, we cannot permit a large immigration of people who are to be forbidden the elective franchise." - pg. 235 Political Discussions Legislative, Diplomatic and Popular , 1856-1886, James G. Blaine, printed 1887 . "This Amendment was proposed by Congress, June 16th, 1866, and was declared to be a part of the Constitution, July 21st, 1868, by a concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress. ... According to the opinion given by Mr. Justice Swayne, as already quoted, the emancipation of a slave removes the obstacle to his citizenship. Aliens become citizens by naturalization; slaves, by emancipation." - pg. 254 "The act passed Congress in April, 1866, known as the Civil Rights Bill, gave expression to this opinion. It declared all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, to be citizens of the United States." - pg. 255 "Citizens are either native-born or naturalized. Every person born in the country is, from time of birth, prima facie a citizen. An alien can become a citizen only by compliance with the rule of naturalization prescribed by Congress. ... In 1790, Congress passed an act requiring two years' residence before a foreigner could become a citizen. In 1795, the time was extended to five years, and in 1798 it was extended to fourteen years. But in 1802, it was reduced to five years, which is the time now required. ... "...a declaration, on oath, of his purpose to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce all allegiance to any foreign prince or state;..." - pg. 88 "The children of persons duly naturalized, who were under twenty-one at the date of such naturalization, shall be considered citizens, if residing in the United States." - pg. 89 Andrews Manual to the Constitution - Revised Edition, Isreal Ward Andrews, D.D., L.L.D, printed 1887 Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment | The Heritage Foundation KEY TAKEAWAYS Critics claim that anyone born in the United States is automatically a U.S. citizen, even if their parents are here illegally. Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual. Birthright citizenship has been implemented by executive fiat, not because it is required by federal law or the Constitution. "The 14th Amendment doesn’t say that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens. It says that “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens. That second, critical, conditional phrase is conveniently ignored or misinterpreted by advocates of “birthright” citizenship. Critics erroneously believe that anyone present in the United States has “subjected” himself “to the jurisdiction” of the United States, which would extend citizenship to the children of tourists, diplomats, and illegal aliens alike. But that is not what that qualifying phrase means. Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual. The fact that a tourist or illegal alien is subject to our laws and our courts if they violate our laws does not place them within the political “jurisdiction” of the United States as that phrase was defined by the framers of the 14th Amendment. This amendment’s language was derived from the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which provided that “[a]ll persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power” would be considered citizens. Sen. Lyman Trumbull, a key figure in the adoption of the 14th Amendment, said that “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. included not owing allegiance to any other country." (emphasis added) Trump Renews Pledge to End Birthright Citizenship for Children of Immigrants | National News | U.S. News (usnews.com) "Most legal scholars say such a move would directly contradict the 14th Amendment, which states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” ~ Those legal scholars would be wrong, as equally as wrong as previous lower court and SCOTUS decisions have been in the distant past (many before the 14th was even passed), as outlined in this article: Supreme Court set clear precedent on birthright citizenship | The Hill The fact remains that the US Government (via democrats/liberals) have been purposely misinterpreting the 14th in created an illegitimate "birthright citizenship" whereas illegal aliens are concerned. The legislative intent, discussions, and final agreements between the states in passing and ratification of said amendment make it crystal clear. Whoever becomes the next POTUS, I do hope they end this corruption where illegal aliens and their popping out anchor babies are concerned. They have no right to citizenship without going through the naturalization process. NOTE : the two cited books at the beginning of this post cannot be linked to online (at least I did not look), because I own the books. The ―originalist argument is that the legislative debates and (to a lesser extent) the overall history of American citizenship and political theory show a ―clear intent‖ that birthright citizenship should extend only to children of American citizens and perhaps of lawful permanent residents, but not reach the children of foreign nationals temporarily resident in the United States, whether legally or illegally. The historical background cited by Dean Eastman is that sketched by Professors Schuck and Smith in their work on the theory of citizenship in Anglo-American legal theory. The thesis of this work, and of subsequent work relied upon by restrictionists, is that modern, as opposed to feudal, citizenship requires consent of the citizen and a willingness to subject herself to the complete dominance of the nation. Thus, children of temporary sojourners—and, for that matter, any persons retaining citizenship in more than one country at the same time—cannot be viewed as fulfilling the conditions for citizenship under a proper modern definition. In particular, the authors suggest that children of illegal immigrants did not at the time of Framing, do not now, and should not fall within the meaning of ―subject to the jurisdiction.‖ This is because the children carry at birth the taint of their parents‘ criminality: ―The parents of such children are, by definition, individuals whose presence within the jurisdiction of the United States is prohibited by law. They [the parents] are manifestly individuals, therefore, to whom the society has explicitly and self-consciously decided to deny membership. The Citizenship Clause: A "Legislative History" Additional research papers: A Critical Guide t A Critical Guide to Using the Legislative o Using the Legislative History Of The F y Of The Fourteenth Amendment to Determine The Amendment's Original Meaning

BACKGROUND: " Aimee Stephens was a funeral home employee who had presented herself as male up until 2013. On July 31, 2013, she wrote to her employer, the Harris Funeral Homes group, so that they could be prepared for her decision to undergo gender reassignment surgery, telling them that after a vacation, she planned to return dressed in female attire that otherwise followed the employee handbook. She was fired shortly after the letter was sent, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission helped to represent Stephens in court. The District Court ruled for the funeral homes, stating Title VII did not cover transgender people and that as a religious organization under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act , the company had a right to dismiss Stephens for non-conformity. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, concluding Title VII did include protection for transgender people, which Harris Funeral Homes petitioned the Supreme Court to review. About a month before the Supreme Court decision, Stephens died from health complications. Representation of her case continued through her estate . The case was heard on October 8, 2019, alongside two other cases, Bostock v. Clayton County and Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda which dealt with Title VII protection related to sexual orientation. The Court ruled in a 6–3 decision under Bostock but covering all three cases on June 15, 2020, that Title VII protection extends to gay and transgender people. [2] " ~ R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission - Wikipedia PURPOSE OF RESEARCHING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND INTENT: Legislative Intent - Legislative History - Research Guides at Emory University Libraries "Legislative intent is the term that the courts have given to their analysis of the historical documents originally generated when the statute in question was under consideration in the Legislature—state or Federal. Whenever the interpretation of a legislative enactment becomes an issue in a case, the courts will commonly resort to the Rules of Statutory Construction to determine the proper application of the statutory language to the facts at hand. " "The Court determines the Legislature’s intention by examining the problem faced by the Legislature when it considered the bill that enacted the language in question, the public policy issues that the problem raised and the drafting solutions that emerged during legislative consideration of the bill." ~ What Is Legislative Intent | Legislative Intent (legintent.com) LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH: The Supreme Court was founded in part to balance the executive and legislative branches of government, and it can help prevent the legislative branch from overstepping its legal obligations by measuring the laws they pass against the U.S. Constitution . "For the Democrats, the courts have long been seen as a bulwark for liberal causes. But this presumption also appears vulnerable. If the courts weaken legal protections related to affirmative action, abortion, and civil liberties, the judiciary’s liberal allies may become alienated as well. In the context of this increased political pressure and scrutiny, being more articulate and clear-thinking about the acceptable contours of judicial power and the judiciary’s role, and the terms under which we can fairly criticize judges and justices, seems essential. To the extent we value a neutral, independent, and effective judiciary, further exploration of legislating from the bench can help us to examine the preconditions and limits of this efficacy." ~ Microsoft Word - LCB_11_1_art9_Peabody.doc (lclark.edu) JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: "The practice in the judiciary of protecting or expanding individual rights through decisions that depart from established precedent or are independent of or in opposition to supposed constitutional or legislative intent." ~ Judicial activism Definition & Meaning | Merriam-Webster Legal TEXTUALIST JURISPRUDENCE: "Textualism is a formalist theory in which the interpretation of the law is primarily based on the ordinary meaning of the legal text , where no consideration is given to non-textual sources , such as intention of the law when passed , the problem it was intended to remedy , or significant questions regarding the justice or rectitude of the law. [1] " ~ Textualism - Wikipedia CASE INFORMATION VIA LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | LII Supreme Court Bulletin | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu) ISSUES: Does Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibit discrimination against transgender individuals, either as a form of sex discrimination or as impermissible “sex stereotyping” under Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins ? MY ARGUMENT AGAINST THE RULING GIVEN BY GORSUCH : Justice Gorsuch violated the intent and purpose of legislative history and likewise the rules of statutory construction when he evaluated the case of transgender Aimee Stephens. In effect, he legislated from the bench via judicial activism. He essentially created law where no law existed within the original crafting, intent and purpose of Title VII within the Civil Rights Act of 1964 where gender identity and sex stereotypes are concerned. The arguments presented by Stephens are patently illogical. Stephens argued that Title VII "specifically" prohibited transgender discrimination [because] it barred employers from terminating their employees “because of [an] individual’s . . . sex.” Stephens further argued that by terminating someone because they are not conforming with their employer’s view of how that person’s “biological sex” ought to present itself, the employer is using that person’s “sex” as it was determined at birth in order to purposely discriminate against them. When one looks at the legislative history of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, "specifically" Title VII, there is absolutely no language or debate involving transgender, gender identity and/or sexual orientation rights given the glaring fact that none were even an issue in 1964 where legal protections were concerned. Issues meaning neither was seen as apparent then as they theoretically are present-day where legal protections were necessarily needing addressed by said Act in 1964. The origins of gender identity did not appear to take a foothold in law until the early 1970s , which had more to do with hermaphroditism and transsexualism than actual transgenderism. The introduction of the dichotomy between anatomical sex and gender identity, then commonly referred to as the psychopathological condition of gender identity disorder, was not introduced into the APAs Diagnostic Statistical Manual until the Third version in 1980, 16 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As such, there is absolutely no measure by which Stephen's argument that Title VII " specifically " prohibits transgender discrimination in employment, or any other area of employment law either. And what one's perception is of what another's sex "ought" to present themselves as is legally irrelevant. To argue such is to also argue how one "ought" to behave when employed, take for example lawfully vs unlawfully; kind or unkind; professionally or unprofessionally. Each measure is a commonsense expectation of behavior, and for a biological man to present himself as a man for nearly two decades as a man, only to one day abruptly claim they are not what they were born as and wish to live their personal fantasy as the opposite sex is a shock to commonsense and the laws governing fraud. You apply as a man, are hired as a man, work as a man, conduct yourself as a man and then inform your employer you will be coming to work as a woman in appearance and wish to be treated as a biological woman is fraud under the law. An employer is not obligated to facilitate your fraudulent behavior. The Funeral Home had every legal right to terminate employment with Stephens. For Justice Gorsuch to find legal justification for acceptance of transgenderism in Title VII flies in the face of both legislative intent and unquestionably demonstrates judicial activism. Stephens then argues that should the Court exclude transgender discrimination from Title VII, it would add to the only codified exception to Title VII's protections. This exception being the bona fide occupational qualifications exception that HOOTERS prevailed in regarding being sued by male applicants denied employment as waiters. Hooters maintained it was on the right side of the law in asserting a “bona fide occupational qualification” based on the essence of its business model. Hooters states that the “Hooters Girl” is the foundation of its business. Which is precisely why Hooters is allowed to continue this business model. It is also another reason why we see no male centerfolds in Playboy, but rather that of Playgirl, and no female centerfolds in the latter magazine. Stephens continues to argue, and with emphasizes, that it mattered not if Congress understood Title VII to encompass transgender discrimination during its 1964 enactment having no bearing on how the Court should determine the statute’s meaning and application present day of that case. This inherently flies in the intent and purpose of the Court to include legislative history in the laws intent and purpose behind its creating and passing in correcting wrongs that have subsequently been made illegal. Ignoring that history of legislative intent and making up terms, intent and meaning of a historical law to fit a present-day issue far removed from the historical law is nothing but judicial activism (i.e., legislating from the bench). And that is EXACTLY what Justice Gorsuch did. This argument of Stephens is a patent false equivalency fallacy: "Stephens analogizes an employer’s decision to fire employees for their transgender status to the impermissible act of terminating employees because they changed religions." Religion is "specifically" referenced in Title VII, transgenderism is not. Therefore, there is no equal comparison, period. Sex stereotypes do not come into legal argument in this case either, despite the arguments Stephens made employing it. Stephens was born a man. He applied as a man. He was hired as a man. He worked as a man until such day without warning he informed the Funeral Home he wanted to be employed as a woman when in fact he is/was not a woman. That is an act of fraud, but also a change in employment terms that an employee has no authority to make. Only the employer can change terms of employment conditions, not an employee. Therefore, the funeral home terminating Stephens had nothing to do with a sex stereotype as he was not being discriminated as a biological female employee, but rather that of the obvious: a biological male employee making unrealistic expectations upon his employer to change the terms of his employment with the employer for which he had no legal authority to affect or force upon the employer. IMO, Justice Gorsuch legislated from the bench via judicial activism and read into Title VII that which was simply not there, nor supported by the legislative history, intent and purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Prove me wrong.

Ever since January 20, 2020, America has been going down the path of directed self-destruction from within by the majority that has become so complacent & apathetic that it allows the minority to run amuck with carte blanche to destroy everything it touches with wanton ignorance and unadulterated violence. Let me begin with the 2020 election, which we all know deep down was defrauded (stolen) by the left & Democrats. Going to sleep seeing Trump winning by a near landslide, then waking up and Biden receiving 81,000 million plus votes was utterly dumbfounding. But the most egregious act was the involvement of the CIA with more than 50 former intelligence agents signing off on an official letter purposely discrediting albeit truth about Hunter Biden's laptop and the incriminating evidence it contained, not only about Hunter himself, but his father, then Senator Biden, Vice President Biden, and now President Biden. This suppression of the laptop during an election was prima facie election interference and a directed effort to help get Biden elected. The same argument the corrupted progressive prosecutors, MSM, leftist pundits, and race baiting grifters have been using relentlessly against President Trump regarding the NDA his lawyer facilitated with former Porn star, Stormy Daniels. Yet no one has applied the same judicial logic towards the former intelligence officials signing off on an unofficial and unsubstantiated (non-investigated) letter declaring Hunter's laptop basically null and void. The two tiers of justice, double standards being applied, fictitious charges were filed against President Trump for that NDA his lawyer bought and paid for with his own money after re-mortgaging his own home, then billing his client for "legal services." Yet somehow Alvin Bragg managed to concoct 34 mysterious criminal charges out of that single transaction that no one even knows or understands let alone can articulate. Even far left liberal Vox admits that this trial was purely politically driven and not legally justified. Then there are the absurd claims that President Trump planned, conspired, and executed the events that took place at the Capital on January 6, 2020. Adding insult to injury were the closed-door Democrat ran hearings regarding J6, as it has been coined, and the restriction of valuable video & audio evidence from the public. Public information being denied to the public, why? Clearly the Democrats had a lot to hide, and since the release of much (if not all) of the video & audio evidence to Tucker Carlson , among others, it became clear that J6 was not all that the left and Democrats kept puffing it up to be. Notwithstanding, the United States Supreme Court has heard a case on the trumped-up charges (pun intended) of obstruction against hundreds of J6 defendants and overruled the lower courts on same. Therefore, it stands to reason that most if not all J6 defendants under that inappropriately applied obstruction charge will have their convictions reversed and freed. After all, Nancy Pelosi admitted on video she took responsibility for not having the National Guard present at the Capital on January 6th. Then when Biden took office one of the very first acts that he did within a month in office was to sign an Executive Order (EO) reversing everything President Trump did in protecting the sovereignty of the United States boarders . Ever since then, Biden and his co-conspirator Mayorkas has allowed over 11,000,000 illegal aliens from ALL OVER THE WORLD from countries that HATE America to "invade" our sovereign nation. That, alone, is bonafide TREASON ! Now as a result of Biden's treasonous act on our Northern but most of all on our Southern border, American citizens and legal residents are being violently, brutally raped, murdered by violent illegal immigrant criminals from all over the world. There are countless official reports of such acts reported across the nation, easily found by any simple internet search. Next is the destruction of the nation's youth through the social contagion of transgender and gender ideologies, namely in females (young girls). In the prior years before pharmaceutical businesses took a foothold on medicating everyone needlessly, targeting the youth was one direct way to screw up the population in order to make them dependent on their false promises using their fabricated drugs to magically change their gender. Puberty blockers were never meant for healthy young boys and girls, only those going through hyper-puberty. Those incidences were far, few, and between and yet everyone on the left swears by their efficacy even though they have never been used on healthy children or young adults in mass for actual medical purposes. No, the usage the transgender and gender ideology demand children be given free and clear access to pharmaceuticals without a care in the world of what it would do to them long term. Puberty blockers: "... a long-term study by the United Kingdom’s leading facility for treating gender-dysphoric children found otherwise. Contrary to common beliefs about puberty-blocking drugs, the majority of children who take them do not resume puberty." Study: Effects of puberty-blockers can last a lifetime | WORLD ( wng.org ) Any an all so-called "science" that the left claims in support of transgender & gender ideology is patently flawed. It takes years, decades in fact to actually know the end result of any particular treatment, especially chemical (pharmaceutical). Then there is the psychological damage on top of the pharmaceutical damage. The of untreated depression, generalized anxiety disorder, panic attacks, and so forth. These are the forgoing reasons why most "confused" by the indoctrination of transgender and gender ideology have such a pronounced high rate of suicidality. A tragedy that is easily preventable if society would just endorse and enforce reality upon the fictional world that the corrupt social media (SM) influenced by the Chinese Communist Party peddles on TikTok, among other SM platforms. The well-known pundit and social commentator, Matt Walsh, has produced a defining documentary that literally and figuratively debunks the entire transgender & gender ideologies with "What is a Woman." A documentary that to this day, has not been debunked on any level or measure. Matt even went on the syndicated Dr Phil show with a few brainwashed guests and demolishes ALL OF THEM!!! These ideological efforts are clearly intended to break down and destroy potential soldiers within America who would actually defend America if and when America was ever invaded. You know the movie with Patrick Swayze, ' Red Dawn '? Does anyone present day actually believe there would be high school kids and/or young adults that would do as Patrick's character and the 'Wolverines' did in this movie? Of course not. Not when we have men like this: No, America would lose any potential invasion by China, among other countries. Oh, and wait, what about this transgender clown: Fake tits flashed on the United States White House lawn for fucks sake. Really????? Oh, and let's not forget about the homosexual sex not only within government offices , but we have a gay man in charge of transportation that hasn't done shit but take vacations and "maternity" leave. He only steps in front of the camera to explain away an infrastructure disaster involving boats, planes, trains and/or automobiles. This transgender and gender ideology is pure nonsense and the clear antithesis of what mother nature intended. Then there is the real issue of transgender violence due to the dire effects of the ideology pushing this nonsense through false psychology and false pharmaceutics altering their young minds and their emotions is clear. The violence is undeniable . How Many Mass Shootings Have Been Carried Out by Transgender People? - Newsweek Rise in Mass Shootings by Transgenders: Two Theories | National Review Despite the transgender ideology, another big issue America faces is divisive race relations. Trump did not exacerbate it, Obama did. And it did not help when thug Treyvon Martin was killed by George Zimmerman. Obama saying "if Treyvon was my son" bullshit. Treyvon got exactly what he dissevered; exactly what Karma had laid out for him. End of story. Nor did it help when Micheal Brown was killed by a police officer defending himself against Brown. Even Obama's DOJ cleared Officer Wilson. Michael Brown was just yet another young black thug that America has been all too familiar with. Then comes George Floyd, a career of drug addicted violent criminal who busted into a pregnant woman's home and shoved a gun to her pregnant belly. Yet "Saint Floyd" has been honored with busts, statues and park benches with his likeness on it, not to mention the endless murals across the nation. The celebration of a career criminal who died of a heart attack complicated by a fatal dose of meth-fentanyl mixed drugs, COVID19, all of which was brought on and exacerbated by excited delirium. The autopsy report made this clear, but all anyone saw, and all the left & democrats pushed was the knee on the back of the neck. The autopsy report also made it clear that there were no life-threatening injuries to the structures of Floyd's neck. The report also disclosed that under different circumstances, like finding Floyd dead in his home with the same autopsy results, it would be determined he died of an overdose. Yet the nation bought the lies sold by the corrupt left and democrat officials in Minneapolis, turning their backs on law enforcement, especially those involved who ended up being charged, convicted and sentenced for Floyd's death when neither caused his death. The documentary The Fall of Minneapolis paints a crystal-clear picture how law enforcement was stabbed in the back and proves Floyd was not killed by Officer Chauvin, or any other officer for that matter. Officer Derek Chauvin, like many defendants who are railroaded by the system into accepting plea agreements at their expense, Chauvin was forced to take a plea to his detriment for a crime he never committed. The left and Democrats just will not let any potential incident that can be twisted to drive a wedge between white and black people in America. However, whenever actual incidents where black criminals attack Asians, Hispanics and especially white people, they ignore it like the plague. The MSM, may or may not report on it, but if they do it is once with no follow-ups and typically local news vs national. Fact is blacks have committed the most homicides since the 1960s, a 2023 report finds . Yet no one on the left, democrats, or the MSM will ever report on this let alone admit it because it just doesn't fit their divisive race baiting narrative that is strictly anti-white in intent and purpose. Facts: "The analysis shows that Black men have had the highest rate of homicide victimization since 1960. That year, the homicide rate for Black men was 42 per 100,000 people. By 1970, it was 78 per 100,000." "From 1980 to 1999, the rate hovered around 54 per 100,000 people before declining from 2000 to 2019 to around 35 per 100,000. In 2021, the number went back up to 54. To put it in perspective, the homicide rate for white males has never gone above 8.4 per 100,000 since 1960, according to the study." 50 years of homicide data shows the weight lands on Black people ( yahoo.com ) Systemic Racism in Crime: Do Blacks Commit More Crimes Than Whites? | Online Library of Liberty ( libertyfund.org ) U.S. DOJ Statistics on Race and Ethnicity of Violent Crime Perpetrators | Prison Legal News FactCheck: do black Americans commit more crime? – Channel 4 News Let's just face reality, black Americans, or black people in general, simply commit more violent person crimes than any other race. Worse is the fact that blacks victimize other blacks (intraracial violence) at a staggering rate of more than 90%. What a lot of people on the left argue against evidence proving the violent criminality of blacks in America is by using raw numbers claiming whites commit more violent crimes. Using raw numbers is an implicit logical fallacy, because it does not take into account statistical proportionality and per capita data. Blacks have been an up and down 12-14% of the total population while whites have ben between 64-74% of the population. So by raw numbers, yeah, more whites than blacks mean more crimes are committed by more whites; but that just is not the case as the data bears out where statistical proportionality and per capita clear shows/illustrates. FBI — Table 43 for 2019 Another undeniable fact that the left and democrats hate to acknowledge is the level of black on white crimes. Blacks kill 2x as many whites than the inverse, but they say nothing and argue (rather brainwash black Americans) that whites are hunting black men in the streets day in and day out, which is just not true. It is the other way around, and the sad reality of how and why is as follows: "Today, after a civil-rights revolution (culminating in the election of the nation's first African-American president) and $15 trillion spent on a feckless war on poverty (the official poverty rate hasn't budged), more than 70 percent of black babies are born out of wedlock. Consequently, unemployment and poverty remain far higher for blacks than for the rest of Americans. More disturbing, however, is the elephant in the living room that no one in the public eye seems interesting in addressing — appalling levels of crime committed by young African-American males." Black-on-white crime in America ( startribune.com ) $15 Trillion! That was your "reparations" for slavery right there, and every dime of it was squandered as any $1 given to black communities across this nation always is due to a lack of personal responsibility and accountability for one's choices, decisions and actions. Here is another reality, as previously mentioned: " T he narrative that blacks are at elevated risk for “existing while black” is true, but not because whites are killing them. Their assailants are other blacks, which means that these black victims are of no interest to the race activists and to their media and political allies." On Race and Crime, a Counterfactual Narrative | City Journal ( city-journal.org ) The facts are undeniable, blacks are killing their own and they have no one to blame but themselves for their own lack of self-respect for their own community members. Another issue that is being pushed to the forefront of all political activist demonstrations across the country is black people demanding "reparations" for slavery . An institution that ended in 1865 and not a single living black American alive today was never a slave, and no white person alive today was ever a slave holder. While many argue that the financial value of the slaves in 1860 (five years before the end of slavery) was around $3 billion, that value was destroyed post-Civil Rights of the 1960s when black Americans stopped being resourceful, becoming educated, and black women marrying the government with free taxpayer money that increased with each child she gave birth to so long as the father of each one was not in the home. That was Lyndon B. Johnson's (LBJ) plan, to have every "Negro" voting democrat for the rest of their natural born lives. The fact is government money (i.e., taxpayer money) has been doled out to the black community across various programs in an effort to "lift them up" to an equal playing field as their white counterparts. Those funds were all but abused and squandered over the decades to present day, 2024. It matters not how much money is thrown at the black community, they will just waste it and then demand more. Here is one of many recent examples: Mom given $10,800 in taxpayer-funded program for poor families spent most of it on luxury Miami trip: ‘I wanted to blow it’ ( msn.com ) And then there are black people who get into positions of power and further squander taxpayer money to their sole selfish benefit: Small-Town Illinois Mayor Accused of Spending Taxpayer Funds on Vegas Trip, Lavish Expenses Accumulating $7M In Debt ( atlantablackstar.com ) Americans on the whole just do not agree with reparations for slavery: Why most Americans oppose reparations for slavery : NPR Bottom line, reparations for slavery when less than 1.6% of Americans owned slaves, many of which were freed blacks (around 3,000) owning more than 12k slaves, were also involved. Then the obvious factor is no one alive today was ever a slave, let alone a slaver owner. There were obvious errors and mistakes made on both sides, yet no one alive today is to blame let alone is financially responsible for what ended in 1865. A recent issue attacking American's first amendment rights of freedom of speech has been addressed by the United States Supreme Court, and it was a very disappointing decision to say in the least. This was a convoluted case, but on its surface appeared rather clear cut; but I will let this author who provides an opinion analysis and argument analysis explain it. Just too much to add herein. Next is the clear weaponization of the law and federal agencies against anyone who opposes the democratic party, individually or on the party on the whole, regardless of class or professional position. The Real Weaponization of the DOJ - The Atlantic Does the DOJ target more Republicans than Democrats? Here’s the data | CNN Politics Will Democrats Regret Weaponizing the Judiciary? - POLITICO Magazine New GOP 'Weaponization' Panel Stirs Debate Among Democrats | TIME House committee on ‘weaponization’ of government kicks off with airing of grievances ( nbcnews.com ) Trump indictment: Republicans say Biden is 'weaponizing' DOJ ( nbcnews.com ) Scalise: House GOP Will Target Democrat Weaponization of Government | Congressman Steve Scalise The Legacy of Obama and Biden: Weaponizing Federal Agencies ( townhall.com ) Thankfully there is some good news amongst all the targeting of those who oppose the left and the Democratic party and its policies. Pro-Life Activist Arrested by FBI Acquitted on Federal Charges ( yahoo.com ) Then there is the rather large elephant in the room, George Soros. Follow the money: Follow the Money: Mapping Soros Prosecutor Funding - LELDF ( policedefense.org ) The Soros backlash: How the nation has turned against soft-on-crime prosecutors ( msn.com ) How George Soros funded progressive DAs behind US crime surge ( nypost.com ) When police departments hands are tied and they do not arrest criminal offenders, they never go before a DA for charging. Those not charged, don't face consequences and are given carte blanche to commit their crimes. And when the police know they must arrest a criminal for a violent crime, for a Soros backed DA to dismiss charges and let them walk, or a leftist SJW or Soros backed judge lets them walk on dismal bail amounts, it drives a knife in the back of law enforcement creating resentment towards the Criminal Justice System they support on the streets. Soros prosecutors are murdering criminal justice reform - Washington Examiner Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg to stop seeking prison in some cases ( nypost.com ) Recall, Remove & Replace Every Last Soros Prosecutor ( senate.gov ) Another Soros-backed district attorney destroying a great American city - Washington Examiner Texas victims' families slam Soros-backed Austin DA Jose Garza for letting killers and rapists walk free: 'How can you be pro-criminal!' | Daily Mail Online Soros-Backed DA’s Office Gave Free Consultations To Migrants Charged With Violent Crimes, Docs Show – IJR I could go on and on and on how Soros funded DAs are screwing America at the expense of American lives The LIST of problems America faces that many are in denial about and let happen is way too long: ~ 2020 BLM Burn Loot Murder riots where NO ONE has been sufficiently charged and sentences compared to the treatment of the tiny riot on J6 and the efforts to silence those arrested & held without trial (violation of Habeus Corpus) ~ Not a single name on Epstein's client list has ever been made public, arrested, charged and convicted ~ No one is above the law???? Obama, Clintons and Bidens clearly are ~ Racist and personal attacks upon white males and Christians accused falsely of racism and nationalism ~ 2020 defund the police and legalize narcotics created chaos and homelessness in addition to increased crime in the streets across America ~ Black Privilege ~ LGBTQ+ privilege ~ Destruction & degradation of television and movie industry with woke agendas ruining classic trilogies, genres and franchisees ~ Corrupt politicians working hard to destroy the US Constitution ~ Climate Hoax & gross anti-natural sources for energy like natural gas with the push to get rid of gasoline engines for EVs which are more expensive and corrosive to the environment than combustion engines ~ The DemoKKKrats and left are anti-Bill of Rights, namely the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments ~ Inflation still on the rise All of this has been going on since the very 1st day Sleepy Joe Child/Hair sniffing pedophile senile Biden took office. Is this what some people really want to continue vs the prosperous world we had under Donald Trump?

It should have come to no surprise that the George Soros funded Georgia Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who ran on charging former President Donald Trump on fraud related charges involving the 2020 election in GA, ends up being a fraud herself. Georgia whistleblowers lining up to testify against Fulton County DA Fani Willis, state lawmaker says "Republican state Sen. Bill Cowsert opened a meeting of the Senate Special Committee on investigations with a bombshell revelation that multiple whistleblowers from the Fulton County's DA's office have come forward to testify against their boss. He said they allege Willis misused state and federal funds -- allegations that come after the embattled DA admitted to having a relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade that critics have called "improper." Fani Willis called ‘embarrassment’ by Georgia residents after admission of ‘personal relationship’ with Trump prosecutor Nathan Wade: ‘What the hell is going on?’ "Willis has now admitted to having a “personal relationship” with Nathan Wade, who stands accused of spending some of the $654,000 he has earned for his work on the Trump case on lavish gifts and vacations with his boss, court records show. “What the hell is going on? I know you guys write the checks. She is an embarrassment to the board and to the citizens footing the bill,” Kevin Muldowny testified at a Fulton County Board of Commissioners public hearing . “Fani is doing exactly what Fani wants; whether it’s carrying on an adulterous relationship with an underqualified stud she hired or ignoring a direct request from a sitting commissioner for a full audit .” Fani Willis Impeachment Moves One Step Closer "In an interview with Fox News , attorney and legal analyst Phil Holloway said the accusations against Willis could result in Trump's Georgia election interference case being dismissed . "If it can be proven she violated the Constitution in the way of substitute due process claims, that she was fundamentally unfair in how she carried out her prosecutorial duties, then that could result in a dismissal [of the case]," he told anchor Harris Faulkner. "It would be a question if she gets recused, then her whole office has to be recused. If she's got a conflict of interest, everybody who works for her has that same conflict of interest. So the prosecuting attorney's counsel here in Georgia or the attorney general's office may have to sort out who in the state of Georgia, if anyone, wants this." A Reality Check on the Fani Willis Scandal "In a recent appearance before Big Bethel AME Church in Atlanta, Willis barely addressed the substance of the allegations -- more on those shortly -- but chose instead to frame them largely as a racially motivated attack." Even Jessica Tarlov, the liberal Democrat on 'The Five' calls out Willis for her "race-card" moving being out of line. Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis reports racist threats over Trump case "A Georgie prosecutor has reported receiving racist threats and abuse as she decides wh3ether to charge former President Donald Trump." She pulled the so-called infamous 'race-card' before even filing the charges, and yet everyone knew that is the platform that she ran on. Why Nathan Wade, under fire for alleged affair with Fani Willis, is facing new scrutiny " Accusations that Wade mishandled the jail-deaths investigation in 2020 are adding to questions about Willis’s judgment in hiring him for the sensitive assignment of investigating the former president and alleged co-defendants in their alleged effort to overturn Georgia’s presidential election that year."

Since Roe v Wade was decided, everyone learned how and why SCOTUS ruled in favor of allowing women to obtain an abortion. That decision hinged on women's right to privacy . Despite the precedence standing for nearly 50 years, SCOTUS got it wrong. There is no right to "privacy" in the 14th Amendment . However, there is a clause within that amendment that directly applies to " personal liberty ." " Liberty is the right of a person to do as they please, assuming their actions do not violate any laws or infringe on the rights of others. What is personal liberty? Personal liberty's definition is the right of individuals to be free of arbitrary restraint or bondage. In short, personal liberty allows people to live as they choose without interference from others unless it is for a good, legally-established reason." The legal definition of liberty is the right a person has to behave as they like, subject only to interference for appropriate government reasons (such as the protection of other citizens' liberties)." A pregnancy is not [a] person with all the rights, privileges and equal protection of the laws bestowed upon actual persons upon their birth. The pregnant girl/woman is [a] person. A pregnancy is not [a] person. It's even codified into law, the definition of what [a] person, human being, child and individual shall be understood to mean, is as follows: 1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant (a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development. (b) As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or "extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion. (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section. (Added Pub. L. 107–207, § 2(a), Aug. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 926.) What the 14th Amendment does in fact state regarding the legal rights, privileges and equal protections of the law for persons is ... that they are only bestowed upon [a] person once they are either born or naturalized. Since this topic involves abortion, being born is the only legal standard clearly demarcated within the 14th Amendment that establishes those rights, privileges and equal protection of the law upon a person. States restricting or outlawing abortion is an "unjustified intrusion on personal security." If children are protected from "wrongfully or excessively administered corporal punishment, whether or not such interest was protected by statute," then girls and women impregnated, either against their will, willingly, or ignorantly are likewise protected in their preserved liberty from deprivation of their personal liberty without due process for the very same reasons cited in Ingraham v. Wright. "The Court also appeared to have expanded the notion of “liberty” to include the right to be free of official stigmatization, and found that such threatened stigmatization could in and of itself require due process. 4 Thus, in Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 5 the Court invalidated a statutory scheme in which persons could be labeled “excessive drinkers,” without any opportunity for a hearing and rebuttal, and could then be barred from places where alcohol was served. The Court, without discussing the source of the entitlement, noted that the governmental action impugned the individual’s reputation, honor, and integrity." 6 The very same application could, and can still be, directly applied to pregnant girls and women who are neither wed or ready, for whatever reason they provide, for a pregnancy and the 18 years of legal responsibility they have upon birth of their child. They do not deserve stigmatization let alone ostracization for merely being pregnant, and/or choosing to have an abortion precisely because they are not ready to become a responsible mother. The fact remains that the pregnant girl or woman is [a] person, who possesses "personal liberty," and is endowed with all the rights, privileges and equal protections of the law. A pregnancy has none of these things. None. So how can anyone argue that which has no protections = to that of an actual person with agency and personal liberty, has far more protections that she? It's insane. It's absurd. It's illogical. It is illegal. It's unconstitutional. The Constitution doesn't cover a lot of things, but they are implied. Personal Liberty rights does cover abortion, and I showed how by the very language used in its definition and the law. Example: right to travel, it is not expressly written thereof in the US Constitution , but it is implied AND has been ruled a right of personal liberty, one's freedom of movement. Kent v Dulles (1958) Example: Right to marry other races (interracial marriage) isn't expressly written in the US Constitution either, but via the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause (EPC), it was inferred/implied via personal liberty rights that people had the right to marry outside of their own race. Loving v Virginia (1967) Need I go on with more examples? SCOTUS screwed the pooch claiming there was a right of privacy implied within the 14th, when there was not. What they needed to do was infer upon personal liberty, the freedom to live and do as they please, especially with their own body, that doesn't violate law or impede a legally legit social or governmental purpose. Had they ruled in Roe v Wade as they did in Lawrence v Texas (2003), overturning Texas' 'anti-sodomy law,' " furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual, " and the law violated the same EPC of the 14th. The obvious conclusion here is that SCOTUS should have defaulted to personal liberty, which is in the Constitution as well as state and federal statutory law. Personal liberty is sacrosanct. That liberty, that freedom needs to be restored for all girls and women faced with life altering circumstances that pregnancy thrusts upon them. It's her body, it's her life, it's her choice. Period.

Let's cut to the chase... As of late, most mass shooters are #POC (people of color), namely black men. Look at the above image. 2021. What do you see? What do you NOT see? Look at the above image. 2022. Just a small sampling. All black men. Did you hear of any one or more of them? Did the MSM cover them? Of course not. And even if any one or more were accounted for in the media, the story came and went as fast as a jet plane flying over your head. *POOF* Gone! FACT: A little less than half of the 6% black male population (3%) commit over 50% of the entire nation's #murders and non-negligent manslaughters. Not #whites. Not #Hispanics. #Blackmales. FACT: Black males murder more whites than vice versa. The rate of murders by blacks with white victims is staggering and flies in the face of the left's and MSM assertion otherwise. FACT: The only race second to blacks who commit the most mass shootings are #Asians. Not whites. Not Hispanics. But the #MSM and leftist #whiteguilt #liberals, along with braindead #democrats, will protest endlessly that white people are the problem and none other, thereby #denying the well documented fact-based truth is that proportionally, black males are the true mass murderers in this country, not whites. Yet despite every incident where a white male (cop or otherwise) kills a black person, the #left and #whiteguilt #liberals go bat shit crazy falsely accusing #whitemales of the #hate in this country, when in fact, black people are the most #racist among any group in this country. And not only against just whites, but Asians as well. And when black males commit mass shootings against Asians, it is not classified as a #hatecrime. Go figure. Classic #doublestandard all the way around. What is worse, even more sinister is when blacks attack/kill Asians, it is blamed on #whitesupremacy. "When it comes to mass murderers, almost all of which are men, white men are actually underrepresented and black men overrepresented when compared to their percentages of the American male population." - Larry Elder "Non-Hispanic whites don't seem to commit mass shootings at greater than their share of the population. The groups that appear overrepresented are blacks and Asians." - Eugene Volokh But these facts are too inconvenient for the left, the democrats trying to score political points with "no tragedy left unexploited" for their personal gain; as well as for the #racebaiting #charlatans like #AlSharpton, #LeeMerrit, #BenjaminCrump, #fraud #ShaunKing, et al. The moment someone posts the aforementioned fact based truths to various social media platforms like #Facebook, #Instagram and even #Twitter, those users get immediately suspended for #hateful conduct rule violations. Meanwhile blacks and white guilt liberals are allowed to post incendiary blatantly fallacious #racist and #bigoted attacks upon #innocent white Americans with absolutely NO repercussion or consequences of any kind. History is replete with horrid example after another of the heinous barbarity of black males they enact upon innocent white men, women and children. Because of Non-Stop Black Violence in Whitest Part of Chicago (Millennium Park), Black Lesbian Mayor Declares Curfew to Try and Keep Tourist District Alive... "On December 7, 1993, a Jamaican immigrant named Colin Ferguson opened fire in a Long Island Rail Road commuter car, killing six and wounding nineteen. In hand-written notes carried in his pocket, Mr. Ferguson made undeniably clear his motive for murdering a bunch of white strangers: revenge for the racism he saw lurking behind every disappointment in his life." ARCHIVE: Black on White Crime The brutal reality of black on white crime The rise of black on white violence ARCHIVE: Videos of Black on White Violence Black Crime: Facing Down the Elephant in the Room Interracial Violence in America - 2018 Incidents Black Violence Against Whites: A Recent History (Truly horrific crimes at the hands of black males) Proportionality While whites are the predominate racial population in this country, proportionally, blacks are overrepresented in violent person crimes (e.g., murder, non-negligent manslaughter, robberies, etc.), to include #massshootings Larry Elder: Inconvenient fact about about mass killings Bottom line is the FACT that white privilege, white supremacy, white violence, white hate is NOT the violence problem America faces; it is black privilege, black supremacy, black violence, and black hate for whites and Asians. Bureau of Justice Statistics FBI Uniform Crime Reporting National Crime Victimization Survey 2019 UCR Table 43 - Murder and Non Negligent Manslaughter by Race Brooklyn Subway Shooter and the Consequences of BLACK SUPREMACY FBI Ranks 'Black Identity Extremism' as a Bigger Threat than Al Qaeda, White Supremacists American has a crime and mental health problem, NOT a white supremacy problem Why you SHOULD NOT support black supremacists At White Supremacy Hearing, Candace Owens says Black on Black Crime, Lack of Masculinity Are the Real Issues Black on White Murder: AKA Black Supremacy The Color of Crime: Blacks kill more Whites UPDATES 2023: Harlem fish store worker charged in fatal stabbing, victim also charged with robbery, burglary, assault - ABC7 New York (abc7ny.com) South Carolina woman killed in Kroger parking lot spit at suspect prior to shooting: police | Fox News Black Murders Eight Whites; Media Blame Whites | National Review Black Man Goes On Shooting Spree To Kill White Men (blackenterprise.com) 9-year-old girl, TV news reporter Dylan Lyons among 3 killed in Orlando shootings; suspect Keith Melvin Moses arrested - CBS News NEW UPDATE 2024: 50 years of homicide data shows black males bear the burden

14th Amendment, Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office: "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." Nowhere in that Section does it include the Office of the President of the United States of America (i.e., The Executive Branch), let's get that straight right from the onset. First key legal term in that criteria is "shall": Shall is an imperative command, usually indicating that certain actions are mandatory, and not permissive. Second key term here is "engaged": involved in activity; involved especially in a hostile encounter Third key term, and its legal definition thereof is, "insurrection": A rebellion of citizens or subjects of a country against its government. Rebellion: The taking up arms traitorously against the government and in another, and perhaps a more correct sense, rebellion signifies the forcible opposition and resistance to the laws and process lawfully issued. The final legal term (phrase) in that criteria is "giving aid and comfort to the enemy": SECTION 3. Clause 1. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open court. What does Aid and Comfort to the Enemy mean? "The two branches of treason, "levying war," and "adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort," are distinct, and do not embody synonymous actions." "The term 'enemies,' as used in the second clause, according to its settled meaning, at the time the Constitution was adopted, applies only to the subjects of a foreign power in a state of open hostility with us. It does not embrace rebels in insurrection against their own government." "...whereas giving aid and comfort is generally committed in connection with a war waged against the United States by a foreign power." President Donald J. Trump did NOT (shall have) directly engage in an armed insurrection "in a hostile encounter" against the United States Constitution for which he gave oath to support. Equally, President Donald J. Trump did NOT give aid and comfort to the enemy since there was no enemy (a foreign power) to give aid and comfort to on January 6, 2020. More importantly, the United States Government via the F.B.I. emphatically declared that J6 was NOT an insurrection. Nor was President Donald J. Trump charged with inciting a riot and/or directly engaging in said riot that was facilitated by FBI agents placed within the J6 crowd and Capitol Police who aided in the breach of the Capitol. "The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials." No insurrection, as such no rebellion either. No enemies (agents of a foreign power) were present at the events of J6 either. Therefore, no enemies for anyone to give aid and comfort thereto. The 14th Amendment, Section 3, does not apply where President Donald J. Trump is concerned. And the following should go without saying, since 14/3 was specifically written after the Civil War to bar/forbid anyone in the Confederacy from holding any office (specifically named therein) that "engaged in" OR "gave aid and comfort" to the enemy during said Civil War. 14/3 has absolutely no relevance to any era thereafter. But more importantly is Section 5 of this Amendment: Section 5 The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Congress, not the judiciary or any Secretary of State has the authority to enforce Section 3 of this Amendment, let alone any other provision therein. And Congress, through an impeachment proceeding, acquitted President Trump of inciting an insurrection. Donald J. Trump can and will likely serve another term as POTUS. March 4, 2024 UPDATE: SCOTUS rules unanimously 9-0 against the Colorado Supreme Court improperly using the 14th Amendment, Section 3 to remove former President Donald J. Trump from the ballot. "The justices unanimously overturned a Dec. 19 decision by Colorado's top court to kick the former president off the state's Tuesday Republican primary ballot after finding that the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment disqualified him from again holding public office. The Colorado court had found that Trump took part in an insurrection for inciting and supporting the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. The justices determined that only Congress can enforce the constitutional provision against federal officeholders and candidates." And let me remind everyone, there was NO insurrection. Even the FBI admitted same; but more importantly, no one to this date has ever been charged and convicted for criminal insurrection. There is a reason for that, obviously.

Ever since the asinine reaction to the death of George Floyd, the call to defund the police and rescind cash bail has undoubtedly resulted in nothing short of an obvious increase in crime across the entire nation (namely liberal democratic ran cities). Biden's crime crisis is so dangerous, that even Democrats in Congress are not safe. What about you? A list of crime spikes in cities that defunded the police Los Angeles: The city cut $150 million from its LAPD budget last July. As of late November 2020, LA recorded 300 homicides. Killings were reportedly up 25% since 2019, and shootings were up more than 32% Shootings in South LA rose 742% in the first two weeks of January. We’re Underfunding the Police Improving our criminal-justice system means spending the requisite money to address America’s horrific and long-standing problem with criminal violence. 'Defund Police' Fueled crime in mid-sized cities. Did Defunding Police Cause Oakland's "Crime Wave?" Los Angeles has been officially designated a ‘third world country’ status according to a public audit of the crumbling city. Newsom grapples with his 'third world country' At least 13 cities are defunding their police force “This experience should be a lesson to state and local leaders about the real costs of irresponsible proposals to defund the police,” wrote U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr of Best’s resignation." As violent crime leaps, liberal cities rethink cutting police budgets "City councils in Oakland and Portland, Oregon, among other cities across America, approved budgets that cut police funding. That trend has reversed. Portland and Oakland increased police funding to hire more officers. The Los Angeles Police Department’s budget will get a 12% boost. Last month Ms. Breed vowed to “take steps to be more aggressive with law enforcement” and “less tolerant of all the bullshit that has destroyed our city”. Why such a stark reversal, and what does it mean for the future of criminal-justice reform?" Illegal Immigrants attack NYC Police in broad daylight "‘Violence — of any kind, and no less against our officers — is unacceptable and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,’ a representative of Mayor Adams tells the Sun." DA lets migrants who attacked NYC Officers go despite video evidence claiming video isn't enough "Controversy surrounding the case has heaped pressure on Bragg after it was revealed that only one of the 14 migrant youths accused of attacking the officers near Times Square last weekend remained in custody on Rikers Island, while the others were released without bond." Illegals who fled NYC after beating down cops may have gotten taxpayer-funded getaway: report "At least four of the criminal illegal alien thugs who recently beat up two New York City police officers have likely fled to California with taxpayer funds after being released without bail. Cops believe the group could have hopped on a bus bound for California on Wednesday after giving phony names to a church-affiliated nonprofit group that helps migrants get rides out of the city,” the New York Post reported, citing law enforcement sources. But where did the nonprofit get the tickets/vouchers for the illegals to flee the city? From the city itself, it appears." The city paid for criminals to flee the jurisdiction. That is aiding and abetting right there. NYC is complicit in criminal activity, and those officers assaulted should sue the city for everything in its coffers. Everything. The Origins of ‘Defund the Police’ The academic theories that have given rise to the new movement are dangerously flawed. This article doesn't even mention the historical lack of funding for police in NYC, specifically for Times Square in the 70s and 80s. Talk about repeating history post-2020 Burn Loot Murder riots. I bet one, maybe two people reading this blog will even know what I am talking about here. The Torso Killer. Richard Cottingham was capable of murdering women between NYC and New Jersey for two reasons: (1) lack of policing, and (2) lack of communication between police departments. The deeper history of "defund": How the "get tough" polices of the '70s and '80s led to disaster Worth the read. Too much information to breakdown here. It is scholarly. Bottom line, claiming policing and criminal justice is racist is self-defeating. Blacks and browns commit a disproportionate amount of crime given their small % of the overall % of the total population. Fact is that black and brown people commit so much crime in disproportionate numbers to the % of their population juxtaposed to that of the total population, but people are too scared to address that reality for fear of being labeled a racist. Well, I say fuck them. Minorities in America are the problem, especially those who will not assimilate and conform to American cultural values, norms, and law and order. The Democrats do not care about keeping America, America. They just want to remain in power, as evidenced by senile Joe Biden and his policies on illegal immigration that have now turned into illegal legalization of those illegal immigrants falsely claiming "asylum." America is dead if former President Donald Trump doesn't win the 2024 election. Even then, if he does, the alphabet mafia and other mental basket cases, namely those on the Democratic Plantation (ignorant black folk, Negroes, N***ers) have already announced they will be attacking Conservatives as a result. Be warned. Be aware. Be prepared. Post November 7th 2024 is a wake up call.

"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." January 24, 2024, Governor Greg Abott is standing his ground along with 51 Texas counties having declared Texas is facing an invasion of foreign nationals. As a result, he has called upon the Texas National Guard to put up and maintain concertina wire along the open section of the boarder located at Shelby Park in Eagle Pass. In defiance of both the Biden Administration and a recent decision handed down by SCOTUS, in no small thanks to Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Amy C. Barrett joining the three liberal Justices, have ruled CBP under orders of DHS (via Biden/Harris Administration) can remove the wire and allow the flood of illegals to further "invade" Texas, and by extension the United States of America on the whole, Abott wrote and submitted the following official letter: Article IV Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence. This invasion is not new, it has been going on since Biden reversed everything President Trump did in upholding the Constitution and Immigration Law, not to mention our National Security and Sovereignty. Texas Sheriff: We are experiencing a 'silent invasion' of military aged men "The “silent invasion,” Coe said, is being committed primarily by single, military age men between the ages of 17 and 45 who are illegally entering the U.S. They’re wearing camouflage and carrying backpacks, according to video captured by cameras placed throughout the county viewed by The Center Square. Many are armed and dangerous, committing robberies and engaging in shootouts with law enforcement, Coe said." Video: Military-age Chinese males entering US through Mexico "The video footage Blue shared of military-age Chinese migrants in Panama coming to the United States adds to a previous video that was released by a reporter in April. The previous footage documented hundreds of Chinese migrants traveling to the southern border." Armed men wearing body armor spotted crossing southern border into Texas "Startling images of the incident obtained by Fox News show the three suspected cartel gunmen, one of whom appears to be outfitted with body armor, making their way through the South Texas scrubland, near Fronton, with rifles at the ready." Military-age males are pouring into America, warns ex-border chief - VIDEO This invasion has been going on for quite some time, as I said, but it became exponentially worse when Biden/Harris took over. Border crisis: Shootouts, pursuits, break-ins surge in rural Texas counties (Dec 31, 2022) "“The type of crimes being committed, the increased violence, the willingness to risk dangerous encounters with law enforcement shows a more sophisticated, hardened criminal who may be higher up on the cartel food chain and doesn’t want to get caught,” Benacci said. “It’s different than others who respond to a social media ad hoping to earn a few thousand dollars to transport people north who get caught and try to get away.” Migrants are showing up at the US southern border in historic numbers. Here's why. Surge of migrants attempt forced entry at Texas border - VIDEO Now the reality: General Flynn: The US Constitution Literally Allows Texas to Engage in War at the Southern Boarder - Here's How "The Supreme Court’s decision this week to order Texas not to protect its border with Mexico will go down in history as one of the court’s most cowardly decisions that could doom our nation — if it is allowed to stand. That decision was not just about razor wire. It was about the role of states in our federal system and the betrayal of the nation — first by a president, and now by two Republican-appointed justices." Tucker Carlson Breaks Down the Ugly Truth Behind Border Crisis with 4 Facts: 'That's What This Is About' “One: According to a recent study from Yale, there are at least 22 million illegal immigrants living in the United States,” he said. That study, available here, was released last September. It’s authors expected to conduct a mere “sanity check” on the generally accepted number of 11.3 illegal immigrants currently in the country, but were surprised when “[e]ven using parameters intentionally aimed at producing an extremely conservative estimate, they found a population of 16.7 million undocumented immigrants.” Tucker then moved to his second point, which is that the Democratic Party hopes to grant citizenship to every illegal alien currently in the country. He suggested reading the party platform from 2016 as evidence." YALE Study Finds Twice as Many Undocumented Immigrants as Previous Estimates Show "Generally accepted estimates put the population of undocumented immigrants in the United States at approximately 11.3 million. A new study, using mathematical modeling on a range of demographic and immigration operations data, suggests that the actual undocumented immigrant population may be more than 22 million." Make no mistake, America is being invaded and the Democrats via the Biden/Harris Administration are facilitating it. "Here's some constitutional clarity on Gov Abbott and the Texas National Guard's fight to secure the border: Texas Gov. Abbott and the Texas National Guard are fully backed by the Constitution as they step up to secure the state's borders. The burden falls heavily on Texas, facing a surge in illegal crossings. Over 2 million in 2021 alone! It's not just that Texas is just stepping up. They are filling a gap left by the federal inaction responsible for the invasion. The President's oath to uphold the Constitution includes immigration laws. Yet, current policies crack our border wide open, leaving states like Texas in a tough spot. The Constitution's "Invasion Clause" (Article I, § 10, Clause 3) allows states to act if invaded or in imminent danger. Texas's actions are a direct response to this clause, aimed at protecting its citizens. Texas's robust response, including deploying the National Guard, is a necessary measure to counter the tide of illegal immigration that is putting Texans and American citizens in harm’s way. Again, this isn't just a state initiative; it's a response to federal failure. Texas's right to defend its border is grounded in necessity and constitutional authority. The state's security and people's safety are under attack. Critics of Texas's border defense misunderstand the Constitution and ignore the realities faced by border states. Texas stands firm, justified by law and necessity. Texas's actions reflect the strength of state's rights and a commitment to the rule of law. They stand on the right side of the Constitution and history. Texas's fight is not just about a border; it's about upholding our laws, protecting our people, and ensuring our collective future. A cause every American should support. @SecureAmerica - X Mark Levin: Is Biden going to federalize the National Guard or send in the regular Army to force Texas to open its border to drug cartels, slavers, MS-13, and the rest, even though Biden himself is violating the Constitution by refusing to uphold federal immigration law? Are the 5 justices on the Supreme Court, led by Roberts and his friend Barrett, pleased with what they have caused? The UK/Europe has already been experiencing firsthand for years the crime, bloodshed, chaos, rapes, murders, property destruction, and all the other filth that comes with ungrateful people from Third World countries.

There very much is a popular ideology called Transgenderism. And it's becoming militant. ideology : Meaning "systematic set of ideas, doctrines through which the world is interpreted" was in use in English by 1907, earliest in socialist and communist writing, with reference to class; from 1918 it came to be used of socialism and communism themselves (along with fascism) and later more broadly still. Ideology ... is usually taken to mean, a prescriptive doctrine that is not supported by rational argument . [D.D. Raphael, "Problems of Political Philosophy," 1970] Idée fixe (1836) is from French, literally "fixed idea." -logy : word-forming element meaning "a speaking, discourse, treatise, doctrine, theory, science," from Greek -logia (often via French -logie or Medieval Latin -logia ), from -log- , combining form of legein "to speak, tell;" thus, "the character or deportment of one who speaks or treats of (a certain subject);" Ideology: a : a manner or the content of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture b : the integrated assertions, theories and aims that constitute a sociopolitical program c : a systematic body of concepts especially about human life or culture Transgenderism [is] an ideology. Liberal progressives will continue to bitch and argue logical fallacies in order to divert due attention from a very serious problem afflicting humanity. That denialism will NEVER change the FACT that transgenderism IS an ideology. Exposing transgenderism for what it is: A lie (washingtonexaminer.com) "That crime belongs to the gender ideologues who are pushing an ideology that is politically regressive in every way. Indeed, “transgenderism” destroys the equality that women have achieved and actually enshrines harmful sex stereotypes in law, medicine, academia, and throughout all of society." Against Transgenderism by National Association of Scholars | NAS "The ideology of transgenderism is so pronounced and so widespread that there is no need to describe it in detail. What occasions a statement from the National Association of Scholars on it are several of the ways that that ideology has disrupted American education at all levels. These include: Vitriolic attacks on faculty members and medical professionals who dissent from the transgender orthodoxy2 Insisting that faculty members and students divulge their “preferred pronouns” and that others address and refer to people by these pronouns.3 The readiness of competitive sports to permit individuals of one sex to compete in single-sex contests of the opposite sex.4 The designation of gender-inclusive restrooms on campus. Yale, for example, has 332 such designated restrooms created at the reported cost of $8.3 million.5 The insistence that archaeologists and forensic anthropologists cease classifying human skeletal remains as male or female, since we do not know the “gender identification” of the individuals.6 Distortion of the medical school curriculum and consequences for healthcare.7 Transgender Ideology Is Riddled With Contradictions. Here Are the Big Ones. | The Heritage Foundation "Transgender activists don’t admit that this is a metaphysical claim. They don’t want to have the debate on the level of philosophy, so they dress it up as a scientific and medical claim. And they’ve co-opted many professional associations for their cause." I supported trans ideology until I couldn’t anymore (feministcurrent.com) "It was at that point — when I was told challenges to and questions about gender identity ideology in defense of women’s rights were equal to the lead up towards one of the worst genocides in human history — that I had my “WTF?” moment, and I began to tip." Transgenderism is 'ideology masquerading as science': doctor | U.S. News (christianpost.com) "Van Mol called the trans movement “ideology masquerading as science, reinforced with emotional blackmail — ‘You have to support them or they’re going to kill themselves' — which is also not true.”" Who Are the Rich, White Men Institutionalizing Transgender Ideology? (thefederalist.com) "Some of the organizations Jennifer owns and funds are especially noteworthy to examining the rapid induction of transgender ideology into medical, legal and educational institutions." How public schools brainwash young kids with harmful transgender ideology (nypost.com) "Militant transgender advocates are imposing their agenda with uncompromising zeal on schoolchildren." The Disturbing History of Research into Transgender Identity - Scientific American "Research into the determinants of gender identity may do more harm than good" TRANSGENDER IDEOLOGY | Peak Trans Why transgenderism is a political ideology and not 'gender identity' - American Thinker https://www.crisismagazine.com/opinion/big-lie-transgender-ideology Transgender ideology - FeministWiki As of late this ideology has become quite militant and even violent. LIBBY EMMONS: The 'Trans Vengeance' movement has led to a series of assaults and now the murder of Christian children | Human Events | humanevents.com WATCH: Riley Gaines Assaulted, Held Hostage by Militant Transgender Activists After Speech – RedState Viral 'Transgender Shooter' Claims After Nashville Mass Shooting Lacked Context | Snopes.com Who Is Kayla Denker? Militant Transgender Activist Posing With Assault Rifle (msn.com) The egregious overreach of transgender activism | The Week Perverse Media Narrative Incites Trans-Identifying Activists to Violence (washingtonstand.com) Trans activist who boasted of her violence is rejected by the Women's Institute | Daily Mail Online VIDEO: https://www.hagmannpi.com/ep-4451-urgent-special-report-dr-rima-laibow-the-nefarious-plans-of-the-world-health-organization-the-hagmann-report-may-26-2023/ JFC! I am watching this video, listening to it, and the evil plans that began with the Rockefellers to present day with W.H.O., the U.N. and UNESCO is just madness!!!!! New UN report advocates for decriminalizing sex with minors | Human Events | humanevents.com "In March, UNAIDS and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), two agencies within the United Nations, along with the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ) published a group of " new legal principles " that would advance "decriminalization efforts" globally, and principal 16 stated "sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual." United Nations Is Calling For The Decriminalization Of Pedophilia, Underage Sex, And Trafficking – winepressnews.com "“With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage,” the United Nations says."" There is more, but the underlining goal is a movement, one of many plans, to reduce the world's population by 90%. Targeting children with all this hyper-sexualization from birth to pre-teen years in order to have a full grab hold on controlling the population. Screwing up kids psychologically through the gender and transgender ideology indoctrination and pushing the decriminalization of pedophilia and a push to sexualize kids in practice is insanity! Going beyond this brainwashing and destroying the minds of tomorrow's adults via today's children, the W.H.O. is gearing up their end game goal to control literally everything: you, food, water, plants, pets, animals...it's called ONE HEALTH . All of this evil doctrine begins with the Fabian Socialists. Huxley's bools BRAVE NEW WORLD was the plan that laid the foundation for all this corruption. Ever hear of Rockefeller's "operation lockstep"? Looking back over the past 5 decades, it is clear this evil plan has been in motion long before us...as such things takes time, it cannot be done overnight. Each operation has been achieved in lock step for sure. I knew for sure that once gay marriage was granted, the transgender clowns would come out of the woodworks like cockroaches. Sure as shit they did. When that happened, I knew pedophilia would be next. It's on the verge of being pushed as acceptable. This shit the woman talks about in the cited video is coming to fruition, has been proven to be true with the historical events she mentioned, and it will only get worse before it gets better. Thoughts? PREVENT GENOCIDE 2030 Transgender Ideology is Riddled with Contradictions. Here are the Big Ones. NEW BOOK: Transgender Ideology: A new threat to liberalism

Liberals are destroying society... and anyone that disagrees with them. Liberals do not believe in the freedom of speech, except their own, while playing the victim card as they attack anyone who disagrees with them. Liberals do not believe in the freedom of religion, except their own interpretation and application of it upon dissenters. Liberals make every effort to coerce others into their ideological agenda by getting their dissenters to say words they do not want to say. Liberals are willing and able to take your children away if you do not acquiesce their sexual agenda of grooming your children into the alphabet soup mental disorders of the LGBTQ+-&! lifestyle choices. Liberals only refer to science when it is convenient for them, but quickly dismiss it when it doesn't fit their narrative. Liberals see Christians as the world's terrorists more than the obvious threat that Islam has been and continues to be present day. Liberals are committed to destroying anyone's life who is outspoken in disagreeing with them. "Progressivism is poisonous." Progressivism is Destroying Liberalism How the left became so intolerant How Liberals are Poisoning the Minds of Young Americans Toxic Liberalism and Poison Politics Perfect example involves Dr. Chuck Mcllhenny who was a pastor at the First Orthodox Presbyterian Church. He won a lawsuit regarding the church's right to dismiss their organist for being gay. This, of course, happened pre-1980s, but it demonstrates the intolerance of the leftists who hypocritically demand tolerance. As a result of Mcllhenny prevailing in that lawsuit, his home and church were firebombed. When his home was firebombed, his family was asleep inside. No one was every prosecuted for the arson attack. For a few years his household received numerous threats and harassing phone calls on end. Some threatening to sexually assault and kill his three young daughters. In the documentary film, A Nation Adrift, "chronicles the outrageous events that took place during the Hamilton Square Baptist Church riot in 1992. An angry group of homosexuals and lesbians, who objected to the speaker for that service, vandalized church property, assaulted church members, terrorized congregants, screamed profanity, threw rocks, harassed and frightened children, and disrupted the service. Rioters pounded on church doors and attempted to break through. When the rioters saw church children standing in the lobby, they shouted, “We want your children. Give us your children!”" How Leftists' Critical Race Theory Poisons Our Discussion of Racism 10 Ways White Liberals Perpetuate Racism Denial Shame & Hurt Narcolepsy & Ignorance Masochism Apology & Faux Compassion Defensiveness The Pain Game Racial Resume White Guilt Intellectualization Toxic Progressivism in Public Schools and at the Chicago Tribune In recent studies and conversations being driven by CDC research, a not-so-new mental health crisis has been upon humanity, namely young high school aged girls, being far more depressed than previous generations. So much so that 1 in 3 girls of this age have seriously considered suicide. This decline in mental health of not only young girls, but boys as well, has been driven primarily by the invention and unfettered usage of smart phones and social medial. Matt Yglesias: Progressives are incentivized to catastrophize (aka the special snowflake problem) – HotAir Troubled youth turned adults in college leads to even more troubled minds to the point that they have been demanding safety and protection from words, ideas and facts that they do not like. How Trigger Warnings Are Hurting Mental Health on Campus - The Atlantic "Get enough snowflakes together, and they can wreak havoc, they're a force to be reckoned with." The Truth About 'Liberal Snowflakes' | HuffPost Latest News The snowflake phenomena isn't isolated to the United States either. How The Self-Hating "Liberal Snowflake" Agenda Overtook Canadian Society (capforcanada.com) Wokeism is destroying the Left from the inside out (washingtonexaminer.com) Wokeness Means Forcing Everyone Inside The Prison Of Mental Illness (thefederalist.com) "Wokeism’s natural logic is to destroy the lives of people of both genders, of all races, and—if need be—those of every age, all to leverage an otherwise unworkable ideological agenda. It is nihilist and destroys everything it touches. It tears apart foes and friends alike, whether by fueling media-driven hatred of Donald Trump or faux-deification of the disaster that is now Joe Biden." Wokeism: The Cruel Destruction Of Society To Make Way For 'Build Back Better' (technocracy.news) "Then-French Minister of Education Jean-Michel Blanquer echoed Macron’s sentiments. He warned , “There’s a battle to wage against an intellectual matrix from American universities.” They were referring to the toxic wokeness that originated inside the hallowed halls of America’s finest universities. But this menace, even at the time these remarks were uttered, had spread its tentacles well beyond academia and had begun to alter the very essence of American culture. It was also starting to take root in Europe. Macron and Blanquer were right about the threat, but they’d arrived at this realization too late." Wokeism threatens to destroy America's foundation. We must not let it (washingtonexaminer.com) HANSON: End wokeism now before it destroys America | Toronto Sun Europe’s War on Woke | The Nation Can Britain survive the woke wave? - UnHerd Why the ideologies behind 'Woke' and Cancel Culture are putting our democracy in jeopardy | View | Euronews Wokeism through so-called progressivism is also destroying the United States Armed Forces as well. 'Wokeism' destroying the military (afn.net) Then the US Government via the Executive branch overreaches with wokeness mandates and policy changes within the federal government. Citizens for Sanity Ad Exposes How Democrat's RACIST 'Equity Mandates' Are Destroying America - Dr. Rich Swier (drrichswier.com) Then there are the flagrant lies (misinformation and disinformation) being put out by Disney among other false prophets with a race baiting agenda) per black activists that try to blackwash history with their propaganda in order to push false narratives that will get them financial favors in the end. 'Blatant anti-white propaganda': Disney+ cartoon pushes 'reparations,' says America 'built on slavery' (bizpacreview.com) The false narrative of reparations (plorenzi1.wixsite.com) ‘The 1619 Project’ Tells a False Story About Capitalism, Too - WSJ Worst of all is the flip-flop on police and criminals, where police are castigated, and criminals are celebrated. This is the most mindboggling of all the woke crap in this world. Woke culture has hit our police hard and now it threatens our safety | Fox News Celebrity-backed woke bail fund has closed after being sued for freeing a serial criminal – HotAir Police, lawmakers slam Illinois criminal justice reform bill that eliminates cash bail | Fox News Some Experts Warn That Joe Biden’s Cashless Bail Policy Is A Prescription For More Anarchy (forbes.com) 'Recipe for increases in crime': Chicago cops warn IL Sup Ct cash bail abolition tramples courts, cops, favors criminals | Cook County Record But thankfully it appears that the anti-woke revolution may very well be beginning. The Ben Shapiro Show: Chris Rock Leads The Anti-Woke Revolution on Apple Podcasts One can only hope so. I simply want my 70s-90s back before all this degradation and de-evolution to human society began.

#CharlieKirk #BenShapiro These two are the main proponents against the right of women to choose what happens to and in their body, but I could list hundreds of thousands upon millions more. Guess what!?! They are all wrong!!! Before I go any further in dismantling the aforementioned in their poorly worded and crafted arguments, let me give you a short list (it could be extremely long, the following are most important): Guttmacher Institute American Life League Wikipedia Charlotte Lozier Institute CDC Human Life International Planned Parenthood I am not going to get into the nuisances of this debate that is largely emotively based. Therefore, I will dispense with all the tit for tat and just present the facts: Personal liberty (legal definition): "the right a person has to behave as they like, subject only to interference for appropriate government reasons (such as the protection of other citizens' liberties)." "Liberty is the right of a person to do as they please, assuming their actions do not violate any laws or infringe on the rights of others. What is personal liberty? Personal liberty's definition is the right of individuals to be free of arbitrary restraint or bondage. In short, personal liberty allows people to live as they choose without interference from others unless it is for a good, legally-established reason." A pregnancy is not [a] person with all the rights, privileges and equal protection of the laws bestowed upon actual persons upon their birth. The pregnant girl/woman is [a] person. A pregnancy is not. It's even codified into law, the definition of what [a] person, human being, child and individual shall be understood to mean. 1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant (a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development. (b) As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion. (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section. (Added Pub. L. 107–207, § 2(a), Aug. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 926.) Facts do not care about anyone's feelings. Pregnant girls/women have all the personal liberty to do as they choose with their body and what is occurring to it or within it. A pregnancy has no legal standing/rights. 94% of ALL abortions take place BEFORE 14 weeks gestation, the majority of those being BEFORE 6 weeks gestation. Absolutely. Positively. NO BABY involved. Now having said that, let me get into some explanation of linguistics. Words have meaning. That meaning is defined by the context in which they are given. Semantics matters. Syntax matters. When you use words out of context, out of syntax, and semantically incorrect...you end with emotively charged terms based on a perverted context in which they are given. As a result, many words are used as misnomers and many are also conflated with others, albeit incorrectly. Terms like baby, child, children...the "pro-life" crowd never, ever uses the scientifically accurate terminology of any of the stages of pregnancy. Be it biology, psychology, legally, or reproductively. They are too truthful, too dry and meaningless for them because they cannot handle the truth of it all. The obvious ignorant (uneducated) #prolife bandwagon considers #conception = to [a] #humanlife or [a] #humanbeing. Problem with that statement is, #cellularlife does NOT equal #ahumanbeing or #personhood. FACT: #Potentiality does NOT = #Actuality. Never has. Never will. Cellular life (i.e., conception), the basic biological criteria for #life, is merely potentiality. Without #viability (capable of extrauterine survival), the pregnancy is immaterial. It will not exist until it gestates long enough within the female #womb, period. Again, 94% of ALL abortions are BEFORE 14 weeks, and viability is technically 19-20 weeks. Less than 1.2% of ALL abortions are AFTER 22-24 weeks. So, the whole "baby killers" argument is unsubstantiated uneducated nonsense. While there are some late term abortions, they are far, few and between (the noted 1.2%). Since abortion was legalized with Roe v Wade, crime reduced because there were fewer degenerates being born into the criminal world. That is just an established fact, beyond any reasonable doubt. While the following will be controversial, the fact remains, that since civil rights, the out of wedlock birthrate for black girls and women have risen exponentially from 20% to 72%, abortion has become a saving grace for many aspiring black girls and women in this country. Ever since Lindon B. Johnson signed off on the War on Poverty, he forced black women to marry the United States Government rather than the black (or other) fathers of their seeded children. As a result, half of the black male unfathered population have been committing over 50% of the violent person crimes in the United States, year after year. Murder. Non-Negligent Manslaughter. Robberies. Over representation in rapes. Half the black male population are not victims of #whitesupremacy, #whiteprivilege, or #white #racism. But rather black induced #victimhood #mentality. Abortion serves a purpose beyond the asinine assertions of Margret Sanger. BUT and I mean BUT, it does not change the fact that eugenics does in fact serve a legitimate purpose. Eugenics is a reality that existed long before Margret Sanger, and as such, some intelligent peoples have deduced that it has actual merit. Merit that has come to fruition to present day. The denial of eugenics has resulted in a fruition of actual degenerates, mentally ill, drug addicts, and a huge cohort of criminals that came out of the woodwork like cockroaches seen in masse during the #BLM and #ANTIFA riots over the past couple years. Back to basics. Fertility clinics and Mother Nature have one thing in common: #miscarriage. The aggregate number the former equals if not exceeds the number of abortions girls and/or women seek in any given year. So according to the sycophants that want to force little girls and women to undergo a life changing procreation experience, and often to the detriment of their mortality, they merely want to see the pregnancy to fruition. Afterwards, they don't care. They just don't care. All that responsibility is thrusted upon the birthing mother who didn't even want the unwanted child to being with. You see all these clowns hollering, yelling, screaming, and protesting that abortion is wrong BUT not a single one of them will take any personal accountability or responsibility for the children they force a woman to give birth to are the true #hypocrites. FACT! Then when those children become a part of the juvenile, and then subsequent adult career criminal element, they bitch about government not doing enough to curb the problem. Get it now??? Again. While fertilization, or conception, meets the very basic biological criterial for cellular life, that cellular life simply does not equal an actual #humanbeing. It just doesn't; as potentiality can never equal actuality. And yet the pro-life crowd keeps using incorrect terminology, misnomers, to describe accurately labeled stages of human reproductive development of a pregnancy. Baby this, baby that. A zygote is NOT a baby. A blastocyst is NOT a baby. An embryo is NOT a baby. An unviable fetus is NOT a baby. An initial heartbeat does NOT equal a baby either. A heartbeat only means that an albeit immature organ (not entirely fully developed) is functional. Take the embryo/fetus out of the womb too early (before 19-22 weeks), and it will cease to exist. That being said, #viability is the ONLY issue that should concern anyone where a pregnancy is concerned. This proves why 94% of ALL abortions are before 14 weeks gestation, the majority of those being before 6 weeks. NO girl or woman wants to be responsible for the outright death of a viable fetus (i.e., if viable, an actual "baby"). Despite viability, the pregnancy still has no legal rights outside of Roe v Wade (i.e. - prohibition of late term abortions for mere contraceptive purposes). Yes, many come back at me with the laws concerning double homicide of a pregnant woman; yet the fact remains that both the state and federal laws written of same categorize or ascribe the label of "legal victim" to the pregnancy, regardless of stage, and never that of [a] human being. The legislators knew that to state otherwise would immediately conflict with established case law (precedence) and Roe v Wade; not to mention the 14th Amendment of the Bill of Rights. So that argument is dead in the water (pardon the pun). The undeniable fact remains, that without fetal #viability there can be NO actualized "human being."