Search Results

"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." January 24, 2024, Governor Greg Abott is standing his ground along with 51 Texas counties having declared Texas is facing an invasion of foreign nationals. As a result, he has called upon the Texas National Guard to put up and maintain concertina wire along the open section of the boarder located at Shelby Park in Eagle Pass. In defiance of both the Biden Administration and a recent decision handed down by SCOTUS, in no small thanks to Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Amy C. Barrett joining the three liberal Justices, have ruled CBP under orders of DHS (via Biden/Harris Administration) can remove the wire and allow the flood of illegals to further "invade" Texas, and by extension the United States of America on the whole, Abott wrote and submitted the following official letter: Article IV Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence. This invasion is not new, it has been going on since Biden reversed everything President Trump did in upholding the Constitution and Immigration Law, not to mention our National Security and Sovereignty. Texas Sheriff: We are experiencing a 'silent invasion' of military aged men "The “silent invasion,” Coe said, is being committed primarily by single, military age men between the ages of 17 and 45 who are illegally entering the U.S. They’re wearing camouflage and carrying backpacks, according to video captured by cameras placed throughout the county viewed by The Center Square. Many are armed and dangerous, committing robberies and engaging in shootouts with law enforcement, Coe said." Video: Military-age Chinese males entering US through Mexico "The video footage Blue shared of military-age Chinese migrants in Panama coming to the United States adds to a previous video that was released by a reporter in April. The previous footage documented hundreds of Chinese migrants traveling to the southern border." Armed men wearing body armor spotted crossing southern border into Texas "Startling images of the incident obtained by Fox News show the three suspected cartel gunmen, one of whom appears to be outfitted with body armor, making their way through the South Texas scrubland, near Fronton, with rifles at the ready." Military-age males are pouring into America, warns ex-border chief - VIDEO This invasion has been going on for quite some time, as I said, but it became exponentially worse when Biden/Harris took over. Border crisis: Shootouts, pursuits, break-ins surge in rural Texas counties (Dec 31, 2022) "“The type of crimes being committed, the increased violence, the willingness to risk dangerous encounters with law enforcement shows a more sophisticated, hardened criminal who may be higher up on the cartel food chain and doesn’t want to get caught,” Benacci said. “It’s different than others who respond to a social media ad hoping to earn a few thousand dollars to transport people north who get caught and try to get away.” Migrants are showing up at the US southern border in historic numbers. Here's why. Surge of migrants attempt forced entry at Texas border - VIDEO Now the reality: General Flynn: The US Constitution Literally Allows Texas to Engage in War at the Southern Boarder - Here's How "The Supreme Court’s decision this week to order Texas not to protect its border with Mexico will go down in history as one of the court’s most cowardly decisions that could doom our nation — if it is allowed to stand. That decision was not just about razor wire. It was about the role of states in our federal system and the betrayal of the nation — first by a president, and now by two Republican-appointed justices." Tucker Carlson Breaks Down the Ugly Truth Behind Border Crisis with 4 Facts: 'That's What This Is About' “One: According to a recent study from Yale, there are at least 22 million illegal immigrants living in the United States,” he said. That study, available here, was released last September. It’s authors expected to conduct a mere “sanity check” on the generally accepted number of 11.3 illegal immigrants currently in the country, but were surprised when “[e]ven using parameters intentionally aimed at producing an extremely conservative estimate, they found a population of 16.7 million undocumented immigrants.” Tucker then moved to his second point, which is that the Democratic Party hopes to grant citizenship to every illegal alien currently in the country. He suggested reading the party platform from 2016 as evidence." YALE Study Finds Twice as Many Undocumented Immigrants as Previous Estimates Show "Generally accepted estimates put the population of undocumented immigrants in the United States at approximately 11.3 million. A new study, using mathematical modeling on a range of demographic and immigration operations data, suggests that the actual undocumented immigrant population may be more than 22 million." Make no mistake, America is being invaded and the Democrats via the Biden/Harris Administration are facilitating it. "Here's some constitutional clarity on Gov Abbott and the Texas National Guard's fight to secure the border: Texas Gov. Abbott and the Texas National Guard are fully backed by the Constitution as they step up to secure the state's borders. The burden falls heavily on Texas, facing a surge in illegal crossings. Over 2 million in 2021 alone! It's not just that Texas is just stepping up. They are filling a gap left by the federal inaction responsible for the invasion. The President's oath to uphold the Constitution includes immigration laws. Yet, current policies crack our border wide open, leaving states like Texas in a tough spot. The Constitution's "Invasion Clause" (Article I, § 10, Clause 3) allows states to act if invaded or in imminent danger. Texas's actions are a direct response to this clause, aimed at protecting its citizens. Texas's robust response, including deploying the National Guard, is a necessary measure to counter the tide of illegal immigration that is putting Texans and American citizens in harm’s way. Again, this isn't just a state initiative; it's a response to federal failure. Texas's right to defend its border is grounded in necessity and constitutional authority. The state's security and people's safety are under attack. Critics of Texas's border defense misunderstand the Constitution and ignore the realities faced by border states. Texas stands firm, justified by law and necessity. Texas's actions reflect the strength of state's rights and a commitment to the rule of law. They stand on the right side of the Constitution and history. Texas's fight is not just about a border; it's about upholding our laws, protecting our people, and ensuring our collective future. A cause every American should support. @SecureAmerica - X Mark Levin: Is Biden going to federalize the National Guard or send in the regular Army to force Texas to open its border to drug cartels, slavers, MS-13, and the rest, even though Biden himself is violating the Constitution by refusing to uphold federal immigration law? Are the 5 justices on the Supreme Court, led by Roberts and his friend Barrett, pleased with what they have caused? The UK/Europe has already been experiencing firsthand for years the crime, bloodshed, chaos, rapes, murders, property destruction, and all the other filth that comes with ungrateful people from Third World countries.

There very much is a popular ideology called Transgenderism. And it's becoming militant. ideology : Meaning "systematic set of ideas, doctrines through which the world is interpreted" was in use in English by 1907, earliest in socialist and communist writing, with reference to class; from 1918 it came to be used of socialism and communism themselves (along with fascism) and later more broadly still. Ideology ... is usually taken to mean, a prescriptive doctrine that is not supported by rational argument . [D.D. Raphael, "Problems of Political Philosophy," 1970] Idée fixe (1836) is from French, literally "fixed idea." -logy : word-forming element meaning "a speaking, discourse, treatise, doctrine, theory, science," from Greek -logia (often via French -logie or Medieval Latin -logia ), from -log- , combining form of legein "to speak, tell;" thus, "the character or deportment of one who speaks or treats of (a certain subject);" Ideology: a : a manner or the content of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture b : the integrated assertions, theories and aims that constitute a sociopolitical program c : a systematic body of concepts especially about human life or culture Transgenderism [is] an ideology. Liberal progressives will continue to bitch and argue logical fallacies in order to divert due attention from a very serious problem afflicting humanity. That denialism will NEVER change the FACT that transgenderism IS an ideology. Exposing transgenderism for what it is: A lie (washingtonexaminer.com) "That crime belongs to the gender ideologues who are pushing an ideology that is politically regressive in every way. Indeed, “transgenderism” destroys the equality that women have achieved and actually enshrines harmful sex stereotypes in law, medicine, academia, and throughout all of society." Against Transgenderism by National Association of Scholars | NAS "The ideology of transgenderism is so pronounced and so widespread that there is no need to describe it in detail. What occasions a statement from the National Association of Scholars on it are several of the ways that that ideology has disrupted American education at all levels. These include: Vitriolic attacks on faculty members and medical professionals who dissent from the transgender orthodoxy2 Insisting that faculty members and students divulge their “preferred pronouns” and that others address and refer to people by these pronouns.3 The readiness of competitive sports to permit individuals of one sex to compete in single-sex contests of the opposite sex.4 The designation of gender-inclusive restrooms on campus. Yale, for example, has 332 such designated restrooms created at the reported cost of $8.3 million.5 The insistence that archaeologists and forensic anthropologists cease classifying human skeletal remains as male or female, since we do not know the “gender identification” of the individuals.6 Distortion of the medical school curriculum and consequences for healthcare.7 Transgender Ideology Is Riddled With Contradictions. Here Are the Big Ones. | The Heritage Foundation "Transgender activists don’t admit that this is a metaphysical claim. They don’t want to have the debate on the level of philosophy, so they dress it up as a scientific and medical claim. And they’ve co-opted many professional associations for their cause." I supported trans ideology until I couldn’t anymore (feministcurrent.com) "It was at that point — when I was told challenges to and questions about gender identity ideology in defense of women’s rights were equal to the lead up towards one of the worst genocides in human history — that I had my “WTF?” moment, and I began to tip." Transgenderism is 'ideology masquerading as science': doctor | U.S. News (christianpost.com) "Van Mol called the trans movement “ideology masquerading as science, reinforced with emotional blackmail — ‘You have to support them or they’re going to kill themselves' — which is also not true.”" Who Are the Rich, White Men Institutionalizing Transgender Ideology? (thefederalist.com) "Some of the organizations Jennifer owns and funds are especially noteworthy to examining the rapid induction of transgender ideology into medical, legal and educational institutions." How public schools brainwash young kids with harmful transgender ideology (nypost.com) "Militant transgender advocates are imposing their agenda with uncompromising zeal on schoolchildren." The Disturbing History of Research into Transgender Identity - Scientific American "Research into the determinants of gender identity may do more harm than good" TRANSGENDER IDEOLOGY | Peak Trans Why transgenderism is a political ideology and not 'gender identity' - American Thinker https://www.crisismagazine.com/opinion/big-lie-transgender-ideology Transgender ideology - FeministWiki As of late this ideology has become quite militant and even violent. LIBBY EMMONS: The 'Trans Vengeance' movement has led to a series of assaults and now the murder of Christian children | Human Events | humanevents.com WATCH: Riley Gaines Assaulted, Held Hostage by Militant Transgender Activists After Speech – RedState Viral 'Transgender Shooter' Claims After Nashville Mass Shooting Lacked Context | Snopes.com Who Is Kayla Denker? Militant Transgender Activist Posing With Assault Rifle (msn.com) The egregious overreach of transgender activism | The Week Perverse Media Narrative Incites Trans-Identifying Activists to Violence (washingtonstand.com) Trans activist who boasted of her violence is rejected by the Women's Institute | Daily Mail Online VIDEO: https://www.hagmannpi.com/ep-4451-urgent-special-report-dr-rima-laibow-the-nefarious-plans-of-the-world-health-organization-the-hagmann-report-may-26-2023/ JFC! I am watching this video, listening to it, and the evil plans that began with the Rockefellers to present day with W.H.O., the U.N. and UNESCO is just madness!!!!! New UN report advocates for decriminalizing sex with minors | Human Events | humanevents.com "In March, UNAIDS and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), two agencies within the United Nations, along with the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ) published a group of " new legal principles " that would advance "decriminalization efforts" globally, and principal 16 stated "sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual." United Nations Is Calling For The Decriminalization Of Pedophilia, Underage Sex, And Trafficking – winepressnews.com "“With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage,” the United Nations says."" There is more, but the underlining goal is a movement, one of many plans, to reduce the world's population by 90%. Targeting children with all this hyper-sexualization from birth to pre-teen years in order to have a full grab hold on controlling the population. Screwing up kids psychologically through the gender and transgender ideology indoctrination and pushing the decriminalization of pedophilia and a push to sexualize kids in practice is insanity! Going beyond this brainwashing and destroying the minds of tomorrow's adults via today's children, the W.H.O. is gearing up their end game goal to control literally everything: you, food, water, plants, pets, animals...it's called ONE HEALTH . All of this evil doctrine begins with the Fabian Socialists. Huxley's bools BRAVE NEW WORLD was the plan that laid the foundation for all this corruption. Ever hear of Rockefeller's "operation lockstep"? Looking back over the past 5 decades, it is clear this evil plan has been in motion long before us...as such things takes time, it cannot be done overnight. Each operation has been achieved in lock step for sure. I knew for sure that once gay marriage was granted, the transgender clowns would come out of the woodworks like cockroaches. Sure as shit they did. When that happened, I knew pedophilia would be next. It's on the verge of being pushed as acceptable. This shit the woman talks about in the cited video is coming to fruition, has been proven to be true with the historical events she mentioned, and it will only get worse before it gets better. Thoughts? PREVENT GENOCIDE 2030 Transgender Ideology is Riddled with Contradictions. Here are the Big Ones. NEW BOOK: Transgender Ideology: A new threat to liberalism

Liberals are destroying society... and anyone that disagrees with them. Liberals do not believe in the freedom of speech, except their own, while playing the victim card as they attack anyone who disagrees with them. Liberals do not believe in the freedom of religion, except their own interpretation and application of it upon dissenters. Liberals make every effort to coerce others into their ideological agenda by getting their dissenters to say words they do not want to say. Liberals are willing and able to take your children away if you do not acquiesce their sexual agenda of grooming your children into the alphabet soup mental disorders of the LGBTQ+-&! lifestyle choices. Liberals only refer to science when it is convenient for them, but quickly dismiss it when it doesn't fit their narrative. Liberals see Christians as the world's terrorists more than the obvious threat that Islam has been and continues to be present day. Liberals are committed to destroying anyone's life who is outspoken in disagreeing with them. "Progressivism is poisonous." Progressivism is Destroying Liberalism How the left became so intolerant How Liberals are Poisoning the Minds of Young Americans Toxic Liberalism and Poison Politics Perfect example involves Dr. Chuck Mcllhenny who was a pastor at the First Orthodox Presbyterian Church. He won a lawsuit regarding the church's right to dismiss their organist for being gay. This, of course, happened pre-1980s, but it demonstrates the intolerance of the leftists who hypocritically demand tolerance. As a result of Mcllhenny prevailing in that lawsuit, his home and church were firebombed. When his home was firebombed, his family was asleep inside. No one was every prosecuted for the arson attack. For a few years his household received numerous threats and harassing phone calls on end. Some threatening to sexually assault and kill his three young daughters. In the documentary film, A Nation Adrift, "chronicles the outrageous events that took place during the Hamilton Square Baptist Church riot in 1992. An angry group of homosexuals and lesbians, who objected to the speaker for that service, vandalized church property, assaulted church members, terrorized congregants, screamed profanity, threw rocks, harassed and frightened children, and disrupted the service. Rioters pounded on church doors and attempted to break through. When the rioters saw church children standing in the lobby, they shouted, “We want your children. Give us your children!”" How Leftists' Critical Race Theory Poisons Our Discussion of Racism 10 Ways White Liberals Perpetuate Racism Denial Shame & Hurt Narcolepsy & Ignorance Masochism Apology & Faux Compassion Defensiveness The Pain Game Racial Resume White Guilt Intellectualization Toxic Progressivism in Public Schools and at the Chicago Tribune In recent studies and conversations being driven by CDC research, a not-so-new mental health crisis has been upon humanity, namely young high school aged girls, being far more depressed than previous generations. So much so that 1 in 3 girls of this age have seriously considered suicide. This decline in mental health of not only young girls, but boys as well, has been driven primarily by the invention and unfettered usage of smart phones and social medial. Matt Yglesias: Progressives are incentivized to catastrophize (aka the special snowflake problem) – HotAir Troubled youth turned adults in college leads to even more troubled minds to the point that they have been demanding safety and protection from words, ideas and facts that they do not like. How Trigger Warnings Are Hurting Mental Health on Campus - The Atlantic "Get enough snowflakes together, and they can wreak havoc, they're a force to be reckoned with." The Truth About 'Liberal Snowflakes' | HuffPost Latest News The snowflake phenomena isn't isolated to the United States either. How The Self-Hating "Liberal Snowflake" Agenda Overtook Canadian Society (capforcanada.com) Wokeism is destroying the Left from the inside out (washingtonexaminer.com) Wokeness Means Forcing Everyone Inside The Prison Of Mental Illness (thefederalist.com) "Wokeism’s natural logic is to destroy the lives of people of both genders, of all races, and—if need be—those of every age, all to leverage an otherwise unworkable ideological agenda. It is nihilist and destroys everything it touches. It tears apart foes and friends alike, whether by fueling media-driven hatred of Donald Trump or faux-deification of the disaster that is now Joe Biden." Wokeism: The Cruel Destruction Of Society To Make Way For 'Build Back Better' (technocracy.news) "Then-French Minister of Education Jean-Michel Blanquer echoed Macron’s sentiments. He warned , “There’s a battle to wage against an intellectual matrix from American universities.” They were referring to the toxic wokeness that originated inside the hallowed halls of America’s finest universities. But this menace, even at the time these remarks were uttered, had spread its tentacles well beyond academia and had begun to alter the very essence of American culture. It was also starting to take root in Europe. Macron and Blanquer were right about the threat, but they’d arrived at this realization too late." Wokeism threatens to destroy America's foundation. We must not let it (washingtonexaminer.com) HANSON: End wokeism now before it destroys America | Toronto Sun Europe’s War on Woke | The Nation Can Britain survive the woke wave? - UnHerd Why the ideologies behind 'Woke' and Cancel Culture are putting our democracy in jeopardy | View | Euronews Wokeism through so-called progressivism is also destroying the United States Armed Forces as well. 'Wokeism' destroying the military (afn.net) Then the US Government via the Executive branch overreaches with wokeness mandates and policy changes within the federal government. Citizens for Sanity Ad Exposes How Democrat's RACIST 'Equity Mandates' Are Destroying America - Dr. Rich Swier (drrichswier.com) Then there are the flagrant lies (misinformation and disinformation) being put out by Disney among other false prophets with a race baiting agenda) per black activists that try to blackwash history with their propaganda in order to push false narratives that will get them financial favors in the end. 'Blatant anti-white propaganda': Disney+ cartoon pushes 'reparations,' says America 'built on slavery' (bizpacreview.com) The false narrative of reparations (plorenzi1.wixsite.com) ‘The 1619 Project’ Tells a False Story About Capitalism, Too - WSJ Worst of all is the flip-flop on police and criminals, where police are castigated, and criminals are celebrated. This is the most mindboggling of all the woke crap in this world. Woke culture has hit our police hard and now it threatens our safety | Fox News Celebrity-backed woke bail fund has closed after being sued for freeing a serial criminal – HotAir Police, lawmakers slam Illinois criminal justice reform bill that eliminates cash bail | Fox News Some Experts Warn That Joe Biden’s Cashless Bail Policy Is A Prescription For More Anarchy (forbes.com) 'Recipe for increases in crime': Chicago cops warn IL Sup Ct cash bail abolition tramples courts, cops, favors criminals | Cook County Record But thankfully it appears that the anti-woke revolution may very well be beginning. The Ben Shapiro Show: Chris Rock Leads The Anti-Woke Revolution on Apple Podcasts One can only hope so. I simply want my 70s-90s back before all this degradation and de-evolution to human society began.

#CharlieKirk #BenShapiro These two are the main proponents against the right of women to choose what happens to and in their body, but I could list hundreds of thousands upon millions more. Guess what!?! They are all wrong!!! Before I go any further in dismantling the aforementioned in their poorly worded and crafted arguments, let me give you a short list (it could be extremely long, the following are most important): Guttmacher Institute American Life League Wikipedia Charlotte Lozier Institute CDC Human Life International Planned Parenthood I am not going to get into the nuisances of this debate that is largely emotively based. Therefore, I will dispense with all the tit for tat and just present the facts: Personal liberty (legal definition): "the right a person has to behave as they like, subject only to interference for appropriate government reasons (such as the protection of other citizens' liberties)." "Liberty is the right of a person to do as they please, assuming their actions do not violate any laws or infringe on the rights of others. What is personal liberty? Personal liberty's definition is the right of individuals to be free of arbitrary restraint or bondage. In short, personal liberty allows people to live as they choose without interference from others unless it is for a good, legally-established reason." A pregnancy is not [a] person with all the rights, privileges and equal protection of the laws bestowed upon actual persons upon their birth. The pregnant girl/woman is [a] person. A pregnancy is not. It's even codified into law, the definition of what [a] person, human being, child and individual shall be understood to mean. 1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant (a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development. (b) As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion. (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section. (Added Pub. L. 107–207, § 2(a), Aug. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 926.) Facts do not care about anyone's feelings. Pregnant girls/women have all the personal liberty to do as they choose with their body and what is occurring to it or within it. A pregnancy has no legal standing/rights. 94% of ALL abortions take place BEFORE 14 weeks gestation, the majority of those being BEFORE 6 weeks gestation. Absolutely. Positively. NO BABY involved. Now having said that, let me get into some explanation of linguistics. Words have meaning. That meaning is defined by the context in which they are given. Semantics matters. Syntax matters. When you use words out of context, out of syntax, and semantically incorrect...you end with emotively charged terms based on a perverted context in which they are given. As a result, many words are used as misnomers and many are also conflated with others, albeit incorrectly. Terms like baby, child, children...the "pro-life" crowd never, ever uses the scientifically accurate terminology of any of the stages of pregnancy. Be it biology, psychology, legally, or reproductively. They are too truthful, too dry and meaningless for them because they cannot handle the truth of it all. The obvious ignorant (uneducated) #prolife bandwagon considers #conception = to [a] #humanlife or [a] #humanbeing. Problem with that statement is, #cellularlife does NOT equal #ahumanbeing or #personhood. FACT: #Potentiality does NOT = #Actuality. Never has. Never will. Cellular life (i.e., conception), the basic biological criteria for #life, is merely potentiality. Without #viability (capable of extrauterine survival), the pregnancy is immaterial. It will not exist until it gestates long enough within the female #womb, period. Again, 94% of ALL abortions are BEFORE 14 weeks, and viability is technically 19-20 weeks. Less than 1.2% of ALL abortions are AFTER 22-24 weeks. So, the whole "baby killers" argument is unsubstantiated uneducated nonsense. While there are some late term abortions, they are far, few and between (the noted 1.2%). Since abortion was legalized with Roe v Wade, crime reduced because there were fewer degenerates being born into the criminal world. That is just an established fact, beyond any reasonable doubt. While the following will be controversial, the fact remains, that since civil rights, the out of wedlock birthrate for black girls and women have risen exponentially from 20% to 72%, abortion has become a saving grace for many aspiring black girls and women in this country. Ever since Lindon B. Johnson signed off on the War on Poverty, he forced black women to marry the United States Government rather than the black (or other) fathers of their seeded children. As a result, half of the black male unfathered population have been committing over 50% of the violent person crimes in the United States, year after year. Murder. Non-Negligent Manslaughter. Robberies. Over representation in rapes. Half the black male population are not victims of #whitesupremacy, #whiteprivilege, or #white #racism. But rather black induced #victimhood #mentality. Abortion serves a purpose beyond the asinine assertions of Margret Sanger. BUT and I mean BUT, it does not change the fact that eugenics does in fact serve a legitimate purpose. Eugenics is a reality that existed long before Margret Sanger, and as such, some intelligent peoples have deduced that it has actual merit. Merit that has come to fruition to present day. The denial of eugenics has resulted in a fruition of actual degenerates, mentally ill, drug addicts, and a huge cohort of criminals that came out of the woodwork like cockroaches seen in masse during the #BLM and #ANTIFA riots over the past couple years. Back to basics. Fertility clinics and Mother Nature have one thing in common: #miscarriage. The aggregate number the former equals if not exceeds the number of abortions girls and/or women seek in any given year. So according to the sycophants that want to force little girls and women to undergo a life changing procreation experience, and often to the detriment of their mortality, they merely want to see the pregnancy to fruition. Afterwards, they don't care. They just don't care. All that responsibility is thrusted upon the birthing mother who didn't even want the unwanted child to being with. You see all these clowns hollering, yelling, screaming, and protesting that abortion is wrong BUT not a single one of them will take any personal accountability or responsibility for the children they force a woman to give birth to are the true #hypocrites. FACT! Then when those children become a part of the juvenile, and then subsequent adult career criminal element, they bitch about government not doing enough to curb the problem. Get it now??? Again. While fertilization, or conception, meets the very basic biological criterial for cellular life, that cellular life simply does not equal an actual #humanbeing. It just doesn't; as potentiality can never equal actuality. And yet the pro-life crowd keeps using incorrect terminology, misnomers, to describe accurately labeled stages of human reproductive development of a pregnancy. Baby this, baby that. A zygote is NOT a baby. A blastocyst is NOT a baby. An embryo is NOT a baby. An unviable fetus is NOT a baby. An initial heartbeat does NOT equal a baby either. A heartbeat only means that an albeit immature organ (not entirely fully developed) is functional. Take the embryo/fetus out of the womb too early (before 19-22 weeks), and it will cease to exist. That being said, #viability is the ONLY issue that should concern anyone where a pregnancy is concerned. This proves why 94% of ALL abortions are before 14 weeks gestation, the majority of those being before 6 weeks. NO girl or woman wants to be responsible for the outright death of a viable fetus (i.e., if viable, an actual "baby"). Despite viability, the pregnancy still has no legal rights outside of Roe v Wade (i.e. - prohibition of late term abortions for mere contraceptive purposes). Yes, many come back at me with the laws concerning double homicide of a pregnant woman; yet the fact remains that both the state and federal laws written of same categorize or ascribe the label of "legal victim" to the pregnancy, regardless of stage, and never that of [a] human being. The legislators knew that to state otherwise would immediately conflict with established case law (precedence) and Roe v Wade; not to mention the 14th Amendment of the Bill of Rights. So that argument is dead in the water (pardon the pun). The undeniable fact remains, that without fetal #viability there can be NO actualized "human being."

https://youtu.be/InsuRkKCdFE - SHE LIED about POLICE and I CAN PROVE IT by former Officer Brandon Tatum. Everything Mr. Tatum says in this video is 100% factually accurate in discrediting the black woman speaking during an interview on a MSM show. Prove him wrong.

I am not the first to discuss this case and that sham organization, as Candace Owens has been all over it. Her NEW documentary, "The Greatest LIE ever sold: George Floyd and the Rise of BLM." The truth, which the media and democrats have fought hard to hide is that George Floyd killed himself with a lethal dose of fentanyl & meth, that Derrick Chauvin's knee was on his shoulder and NOT on his neck; and all the money made by BLM was spent in one of two ways: (1) to Patrice Cullors and her cronies' buying mansions in white neighborhoods, and (2) to gender ideology organizations. All of which Candace covers in her documentary. Bottom line, not a single penny actually went to a black business, black organization, black school, or even a black neighborhood. Not a cent. Everyone knows the inherent imminent danger that fentanyl poses, it's not rocket science. And the toxicology report of George Floyd proves beyond any doubt that he died of an overdose and not any knee on a shoulder or the spuriously claimed neck. The initial coroner's report substantiates the toxicology report AND denotes NO trauma to the neck, absolutely none. George Floyd had hypertension, an enlarged heart, and was grossly overdosed with fentanyl. The fentanyl and Police departments, cities, etc. always "settle" with families in racially charged cases due to the racial nature of the case. Why? Because of the black assailant, perp, suspect, violent offender, whoever is found at fault and the city, cops, or whomever was not...then there will be violent unrest and rioting, pillaging, burning and killing by black folk. That's just a fact of life in this country because blacks are not being held accountable for their actions. "Fentanyl overdoses become No. 1 cause of death among US adults, ages 18-45: 'A national emergency' Fentanyl: Here's how it kills you | CBC News Police show how much fentanyl it takes to kill you (nbc4i.com) Fentanyl Facts (cdc.gov) Facts about Fentanyl (dea.gov) How much fentanyl will kill you? - Harm Reduction Ohio Floyd killed himself. Period. No knee on his neck, shoulder, butt, or anywhere else would have killed him given the FACT that he was ALREADY in respiratory distress before cops arrived on scene. The audio of the bodycam proves that as they approach Floyd's car. Floyd admitted to consuming too much narcotics too. Chauvin is a race based political prisoner. Period. Effects of Fentanyl "Fentanyl’s mechanism of action is believed to primarily involve its ability to act as an opioid agonist, which means that the drug readily attaches to neurons in the central nervous system that are specialized for neurotransmitters like enkephalins and endorphins. These substances are often referred to as endogenous opiates because they have a similar chemical structure to opiate drugs. Because the neurons in the brain that are specialized for these endogenous opiates substances are ready-made for synthetic drugs like fentanyl, these drugs are very efficient at controlling pain, reducing stress, increasing sedation, and lessening anxiety. They slow down the actions of the neurons in the brain and spinal cord. Because the brain is the control center for nearly every important bodily function, slowing the functioning of the brain also results in slowing the actions of other organs, such as the heart, lungs, kidneys, etc., as well as reducing the ability to engage in voluntary actions, such as walking, talking, and even thinking." (emphasis mine) Fentanyl Overdose Symptoms The signs and symptoms that occur in individuals who have overdosed on fentanyl can consist of: Extreme drowsiness, lethargy, lightheadedness, or dizziness. Marked difficulty with balance, difficulty with walking, and decreased motor coordination. Complaints of nausea and vomiting. Significant mental status changes that often include slurred speech, decreased speed of thought (that can be observed by extremely slow rates of speech), confusion, irrational actions, and/or aggressiveness. Pinpoint eye pupils and/or bluish or purplish lips, hands, feet, fingernails, and/or toenails. Noticeably slowed or shallow breathing (In some cases, people may stop breathing or produce gurgling noises.). A marked reduction in blood pressure and heart rate. Becoming unconscious or comatose. The lethal effects that occur because of fentanyl overdose are most often due to significant respiratory suppression or the complete halting of breathing as a result of the central nervous system depressant effects of the drug. (NOTE: George Floyd was exhibiting all the above bolded symptoms easily seen in various videos recorded of the incident) The Deadly Effects of Mixing Meth and Fentanyl "Some people believe that the stimulant effects of meth and the opioid effects of fentanyl would cancel each other out, creating a strong high without the side effects that can lead to a deadly overdose. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Drugs don’t all have the same effects on every user, and their side effects do not counteract one another as if there is some simple, chemistry equation behind their use. Instead, what winds up happening is the use of two very powerful drugs at once puts an inordinate strain on the user’s body and brain. In addition, many people who are taking meth and fentanyl together do not realize they are doing so. Often, individuals who take meth or cocaine laced with fentanyl have a low tolerance for opioids and are at risk of overdose (NIDA). Essentially, these are two of the most dangerous drugs one could take alone but especially in combination when it comes to overdose." The Dangers of Combining Meth With Fentanyl The effects of fentanyl and methamphetamine on the body and central nervous system are oppositional, so when taken together, one substance can dull the effects of another. When meth is laced with fentanyl, this can cause the meth user to take more doses, increasing the amount of fentanyl in the system and leading to overdose and overdose death. When the two substances are being taken together intentionally, whichever product is being dulled by the other will result in increasing doses, posing a risk of overdose or at the very least overload in the body, which can have catastrophic results. In short, combining fentanyl and meth can lead to: Dulling the effects of one substance or the other Overtaking one substance or the other Not experiencing overdose symptoms Delayed symptoms of overdose Meth Overdose: Trouble breathing Heart attack Stroke Chest pain Seizures High blood pressure High body temperature Intense hyperactivity or aggression Fentanyl Overdose: Very small pupils Severe respiratory depression Cold clammy skin Gray, blue, or pale skin Blue or purple lips and nails Complete stop in breathing Loss of consciousness Unresponsiveness, even to pain Vomiting Choking or gurgling sounds (NOTE: Bolded points Floyd was obviously experiencing as seen in the various videos of the event) Then there is this: "Cardiopulmonary arrest is simply when the heart stops beating and lungs stop moving, which other medical examiners The Times reporter spoke with often do not include on their reports, as this happens in all deaths." ~ Forensic Pathologist: If We Found George Floyd at Home with That Amount of Fentanyl and Meth, It Could Be an Overdose (westernjournal.com) It is odd that medical examiners do not note that medical fact since it is an obvious occurrence in ALL manners of death. In other words, it is of absolutely no clinical significance as to the actual "manner of death," since it is an end result "in all deaths." "“A. Blood drug and novel psychoactive substances screens: “1. Fentanyl 11 ng/mL” That’s just the first few words of the “Toxicology” section. Also listed are norfentanyl, 4-ANPP, methamphetamine, cannabinoids, amphetamines, morphine and so on. But the 11 nanograms per milliliter of fentanyl is rather important, inasmuch as the chief medical examiner called this “a fatal level of fentanyl under normal circumstances,” saying, “deaths have been certified with levels of 3.” Three. But George Floyd went up to 11. Fentanyl Facts (cdc.gov) Facts about Fentanyl (dea.gov) How much fentanyl will kill you? - Harm Reduction Ohio T. Thao Bates #14164-22944 - excluding codefendants personnel records.pdf (mncourts.gov) BATES #8131 - 14163.pdf (mncourts.gov) Medical examiner: George Floyd had 'fatal level of fentanyl' in his system, but is 'not saying this killed him' | Fox News George Floyd’s death, specifically the illicit drugs he consumed prior to the initial contact with police and the excited delirium that followed during his apprehension that lead to his cardiac arrest and respiratory failure. Two common results of an overdose when one is “speedballing.” In other words, when one is taking/consuming a strong stimulant like meth that staves off the effects of depressants like fentanyl and amphetamines, when the stimulant(s) wears off, fatality more often than not occurs (unless medical intervention is immediate upon noticing the symptoms of an overdose). As in the case of Mr. George Floyd. An individual addicted to illicit drugs like fentanyl, amphetamines, morphine, marijuana and methamphetamines. However, pseudo know-it-alls, Floyd did not die from what they would consider as a “recreational drug,” but rather from the neck compression (despite the coroner clearly reporting absolutely “no life-threatening injuries [were] identified.” In comments in another formal debate, Mps1213 basically, for a lack of better terms, mouthed off that he knows better than Sir.Lancelot, myself and anyone else on this subject of Floyd’s death who dares say otherwise. So, this forum thread is being created to challenge him on this very subject, and to allow anyone else so interested and inclined to join the debate/discussion, pro or con, may do so. This shall (or rather should/could) provide a learning experience for all involved. So without further adieu… On May 26, 2020, at 9:25am, just 12 hours after Floyd’s pronounced death, the coroner completed the autopsy of George Floyd. “As was released earlier by the medical examiner’s office, Floyd’s cause of death is listed officially as “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.” The full autopsy report states further that “no life-threatening injuries [were] identified.” The medical examiner’s office had also previously deemed the manner of Floyd’s death a “homicide.” The report describes Floyd as a “46-year-old man who became unresponsive while being restrained by law enforcement officers; he received emergency medical care in the field and subsequently in the Hennepin HealthCare (HHC) Emergency Department, but could not be resuscitated.” https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/live-trials-current/george-floyd-death/authorities-just-released-george-floyds-complete-autopsy-report-read-it-here/ The above quotes are not only poorly written grammatically and contextually, but they are also self-contradictory. Then there is this: “Critically, the report says Floyd “experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest while being restrained by law enforcement officer(s).” https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/authorities-declare-george-floyds-death-a-homicide-but-still-contradict-familys-independent-autopsy/ Having provided those two quotes (and sources) to describe the coroners official findings of the manner in which George Floyd died, what I implore upon anyone and everyone reading this thread is the fact that you each have to look at the data and circumstances OBJECTIVELY, not subjectively driven by emotion or otherwise. Nor any absurd appeals to authority either. The people with letters after their name all perjured themselves on the stand regarding the subject matter being discussed herein. To clarify my position on the stated manner of death: “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression” The wording of this statement, contextually, directly implies that Floyd’s experiencing a heart attack – in the moment (i.e., excited delirium) – complicated the subdued, restrain, and neck compression” executed by law enforcement. When I read this from a law enforcement perspective, this tells me that while all the officers involved, especially Chauvin, were doing exactly what they were trained to do in order to calm Floyd down and subdue him without increasing the use of force continuum…Floyd’s heart attack “complicated” that effort that required EMS to be called vs routine transport to the county jail for booking. Yet people like Mps1213, BLM (Burn Loot Murder aka Black Lives Matter), and the leftist propaganda machine (MSM) would have everyone believe that Chauvin either broke or compressed his neck so much that it caused damage to his larynx and caused asphyxiation. That couldn’t be further from the truth. As the coroner clearly noted: “no life-threatening injuries [were] identified.” Given the fact that there were “no life-threatening injuries” identified during the initial/original unbiased autopsy by the county coroner, that leaves the question: why/how did George Floyd die. Well, the next place to look is the Toxicology report: https://famous-trials.com/george-floyd/2648-george-floyd-the-toxicology-report for the (in your face) obvious answer. He died of a drug overdose brought on by a lethal concoction of fentanyl, methamphetamines, amphetamines, morphine and marijuana. Stimulants vs depressants. A deadly combination either way you slice and dice it. And when you add comorbidities like hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and a positive test for COVID-19…well, death was certain and imminent. See below: “Underlying Conditions The report says Floyd’s autopsy revealed three “natural diseases:” (1) “arteriosclerotic heart disease,” which it described as “multifocal, severe;” (2) “hypertensive heart disease,” which included a “clinical history of hypertension,” and (3) a left pelvic tumor, which it described as “incidental.” (Incidental tumors are generally benign.) The report elsewhere said that a “cross sections of coronary arteries, though not all ideally oriented, confirm the gross impression of atherosclerotic narrowing.” Then add into that mix the toxicology findings, broken down and sectioned out here (same place the above quote was taken from): https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/live-trials-current/george-floyd-death/authorities-just-released-george-floyds-complete-autopsy-report-read-it-here/ The obvious fact of the matter is Floyd consumed a fatal dose of fentanyl and meth in what is commonly known as “speedballing.” https://www.training.fadaa.org/Speedballing/Speedballing_PPT.pdf The lethal dose of fentanyl is 2mg (but can be less); Floyd had 11ng/mL in his blood as reported in the toxicology report. But when combined with all the other stimulants and depressants he willingly consumed that day, Floyd was “dead man walking.” Which perfectly explains why he can be heard on body-cam footage upon initial and immediately following contact by police (long before the infamous knee) telling them he was having trouble breathing. Respiratory distress and failure is a common result of mixing potent stimulants with deadly depressants. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/george-floyd-told-police-he-was-struggling-breathe-officer-put-n1218556 The risks of combining fentanyl and meth is no secret. Fentanyl is not a new drug, but it is certainly more dangerous than most others, especially when combined with other drugs like methamphetamines, amphetamines, et al. https://www.ashevillerecoverycenter.com/methamphetamine-and-fentanyl/ “Deaths related to methamphetamine cut with fentanyl appear to have spiked in recent years; for instance, a 2022 report from the New York State Department of Health noted that overdose deaths involving methamphetamine notably increased in the state (outside of New York City) from 2016 to 2020, but that the majority of those deaths also involved fentanyl. This suggests that “the potent opioid [fentanyl] has actually been driving the increase.” Part of the reason the combination is particularly dangerous is because it combines an opioid (a depressant) with meth (a stimulant). According to the Florida Alcohol & Drug Abuse Association, the combination of an opioid and stimulant, when taken intentionally, is sometimes called “speed-balling.” The opposing effects of the two types of substances can mask each other, making overdose more likely. For instance, in some cases of overdose, the stimulant’s effects may wear off, and respiratory failure can result—particularly from an opioid as strong as fentanyl.” https://www.webmd.com/connect-to-care/addiction-treatment-recovery/fentanyl-overdose-and-adulterated-methamphetamines https://www.rehabcenter.net/polysubstance-abuse/opiates-amphetamines/ Taking into consideration the multitude of deaths, reported overdoses, and the scientific evidence that explains the ever increasing uptick in deaths related to fentanyl overdoses when mixed (laced) with other illicit drugs, and the fact that the coroner made it perfectly clear in his report that there was absolutely no life threatening injuries to Floyd’s body (e.g. his neck, specifically), the ONLY LOGICAL CONCLUSION is that he died from an overdose complicated by excited delirium during his arrest. That’s all on him and has no bearing on the officers and the manner in which they conducted their arrest per their own departments training guidelines and S.O.P. The ONLY reason the officers were ostracized and Chauvin was tried is it was yet another (among many) distractions the left and Democrats took advantage of (never let a tragedy go to waste) in further dividing this country and gaining or solidifying current democratic voters to continue voting for the Democratic Party. Officer Chauvin is innocent and he is nothing short of being a political prisoner in his win country for which he swore an oath to defend, and that country turned its back on him all in the name of divisive political rhetoric on faux racism and police brutality claims. "Thao’s attorney, Robert Paule, asked Tuesday whether Baker was pressured into listing “neck compression” as a factor in his autopsy report. Baker testified that he told prosecutors on the day of Floyd’s autopsy that there was no physical evidence of asphyxia, or insufficient oxygen. Prosecutors put that information in their initial complaint against Chauvin, and listed existing health conditions, police restraint and potential intoxicants as contributing factors."

8 Facts you should know about racial injustice in the criminal justice system: Racial discrimination has been ingrained in the criminal legal system from its earliest days and persists today. "The legacy of slavery, racist Jim Crow laws, and hateful lynchings has translated into modern-day mass incarceration and the disproportionate imprisonment of Black people." 1. More than half of death row exonerees are Black. Of the 185 people exonerated from death row since 1973, about 53% are Black, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Historically the death penalty has been disproportionately applied to Black people in the U.S., and they are still overrepresented on death row. FACT: Black or African American commit over 50% (53%) of the homicides for the entire country. FACT: Black or African American are 58% of the homicide victims (with over 90% being killed by other blacks or African American). 2. Nearly half the people currently on death row are Black In 2020, about 42% of people on death row were Black...though Black people make up just 13% of the U.S. population overall. The death penalty is more likely to be used in cases in which a white person is killed... When less than 0.5% of the 6% black population of 13% total black or African American population are committing over 50% of the entire nation's violent person crime, it stands to reason that blacks would be overrepresented on death row for the homicides they commit. Every year blacks or African Americans kill more whites than vice versa. So, it stands to reason that the death penalty would be "more likely" used in such cases, versus when a white killing a black, which are significantly fewer. 3. Half of the 2,947 people exonerated since 1989 are Black. According to the National Registry of Exonerations, 1,471 Black people have been exonerated since 1989. Clearly for a multitude of differing reasons on a case-by-case basis. 4. Innocent Black people are seven times more likely to be wrongfully convicted of murder than innocent white people. Among Black people exonerated from murder convictions, approximately 31% were wrongly convicted of killing white people, though just 15% of homicides by Black people involved white victims... They need to define "wrongly," as there are a multitude of differing reasons; and the other 85% of homicides by black people involved black victims. Intraracial violence is grossly excessive within the black community. 5. It takes longer to exonerate an innocent Black person. Black people wrongly convicted of murder spend an average of three more years in prison than white people — four if they are on death row. Innocent Black people spend an average of 16 years on death row before they are exonerated. The appeals process and filing of motions by the innocence project takes time. No legitimate exoneration happens overnight. 6. Police misconduct occurred in more than half of all wrongful murder conviction cases involving innocent Black people. According to the National Registry of Exonerations, cases of Black people exonerated from wrongful murder convictions were 22% more likely to involve police misconduct than similar cases involving white defendants. Vague. Misconduct needs to be defined here; and white defendants sure as shit have been railroaded by police "misconduct" as well. 7. About one-third of unarmed people killed by police are Black. Of the more than 149 unarmed people killed by the police in 2017, 49 were Black, according to Mapping Police Violence. And? It is common knowledge that since then (and even prior to), blacks have become ever more brazen with law enforcement encounters where they immediately become defiant, verbally accosting, resist arrest, flee, fight and even try to harm the police. As such, 90-95% of all shootings are ruled legally justified. Cops are approximately 19x more likely to be shot and killed by an armed black person, than an unarmed black person being shot (and not necessarily killed) by police at approximately 2.5-3x. In the aggregate, whites and Hispanics are shot more by police, not blacks. A Washington State University study has conclusively shown that law enforcement are less likely to pull the trigger on a black suspect than any other race. "Participants in an innovative Washington State University study of deadly force were more likely to feel threatened in scenarios involving black people. But when it came time to shoot, participants were biased in favor of black suspects, taking longer to pull the trigger against them than against armed white or Hispanic suspects." ‘Deadly force’ lab finds racial disparities in shootings – WSU Insider This study found race matters in police shootings, but the results may surprise you | CAS in the Media | Washington State University (wsu.edu) 8. Black people are more likely to be stopped and searched. Studies have shown that Black people, Latinx people, and communities of color are more likely to be stopped, searched, and suspected of a crime — even when no crime has occurred. FACT: Black and brown people commit a disproportionate amount of crime in this country. Law enforcement go where the crime is, not where it is not. FACT: Majority of crimes in the NYC subway system were being committed by black and brown people; Guliani's Stop n Frisk program WORKED! Racial bias in policing contributes to the wrongful incarceration and conviction of innocent Black people and is also seen in arrest quotas, the use of surveillance technologies like facial recognition software to identify suspects, predictive policing tools, and gang databases. FACT: Criminological data conclusively demonstrates that black and brown people commit a disproportionate number of certain crimes, so law enforcement, in being proactive, will target those demographics committing the most crime in order to prevent that crime. Bottom line, this article by the Innocence Project is nothing short of misinformation and disinformation. It's part of the reason why many on the left carry and parrot the wrong ideas about law enforcement and the criminal justice system.

As of late this world is going crazy over criminals being treated like criminals to the point of placing them into the category of heroes and if killed, martyrs for their criminality just because they are a person of color #POC. As a result, law enforcement has been castigated and labelled the criminals for upholding the law. This is pure insanity and a recipe for anarchy and chaos. The most recent shooting involves Patrick Lyoya, an immigrant from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Africa), who was pulled over by an officer for having a state issued license plate with a registration that did not match the vehicle Patrick was driving. The officer pulled over the vehicle and the video immediately shows Patrick getting out of the vehicle. Upon doing so, the officer gives a lawful order directing him to return to his vehicle. Police are trained that when a person exits a vehicle upon being pulled over is cause to escalate the use of force paradigm, especially when the person exiting the vehicle tries to flee and/or fights with the officer, which is precisely what follows. The real tragedy here is the glowing fact that since the death of George Floyd , people have gone bat shit crazy over race relations. Problem with that specific case is the glowing indisputable fact that Floyd killed himself. Yes, I know. Everyone believes Officer Chauvin killed him with the infamous "knee on the neck," but that is NOT what killed Floyd. His death was turned into a political shit show for the sole sake of appeasing blacks and white guilt liberals. Otherwise the riots that already destroyed numerous cities across America and abroad would have been renewed once again had Chauvin been acquitted. Therefore, just like OJ trial on the heels of the Rodney King "incident," jurors were too scared to acquit when they knew that was the legally correct ruling. Some jurors refused to uphold their oath and ruled merely because they "felt" it was justice for Rodney King. Unfortunately, and as unprecedented as it clearly was, the jurors in the Chauvin case faced death threats if they acquitted. Moreover, the jurors were never sequestered, allowing them to be bombarded with race baiting propaganda from the left and democrats, in addition to the death threats. As a result, Chauvin became nothing more than a political prisoner to appease people of color and white guilt liberals in America. Michael Brown, Trayvone Martin (shot and killed by a "white" Hispanic), Tamir Rice, and many more have all been in the headlines as unjustified "police brutality" or "white rage." All of which has been proven unfounded time and time again. But it simply does not stop the leftist anti-American and anti-law enforcement zombie bandwagon members from foaming at the mouth on indefensible claims of injustice at the hands of police. Especially when the #facts fit the opposite side of their unfounded claims. The simple and justifiable (provable) fact is that black boys/men are the direct cause of over 50% of the entire nation's violent person crimes. Murder. Non-Negligent Manslaughter. Robbers. Rape. Et al. The aforementioned is an inconvenient truth that POC, namely blacks, simply refuse to admit. It is called #denialism. Blacks are in #denial of the #fact their own people are more of a problem for America than any other race. And a lot of it has to do with the subculture that black Americans created. Patrick should have just done what he was told, but because of the black subculture in America, black leaders and black peers are constantly telling blacks, men and women, since his arrival via social media, that he should feel empowered to run and fight police, even reportedly yelling "I'm a black man" just before the officer's body camera suddenly cut out. This article breaks things down pretty good. LINK. The officer involved in the shooting has since been identified due to the growing pressure from Ambulance Chaser Civil Attorney, Benjamin Crump. Unfortunately for Crump, the officer involved has a stellar record with no legitimate complaints. But one thing that always stands out about Crump is he makes a lot of baseless assertions when it comes to law enforcement Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), training, and legal authority of officers. He is a civil attorney, not a criminal attorney and he definitely has never served a millisecond as a law enforcement officer. And yet Crump feels comfortable making sweeping hasty generalization fallacies and outright lies about what cops are supposed to do and not to do when engaging suspects fighting back: "The video clearly shows that this was an unnecessary, excessive, and fatal use of force against an unarmed Black man who was confused by the encounter and terrified for his life. It should be noted that Patrick never used violence against this officer even though the officer used violence against him in several instances for what was a misdemeanor traffic stop.” Patrick never used violence, really? He grabbed the officer's taser. He fought with the officer. He refused to abide by the officer's lawful orders. Why would Patrick be "terrified for his life" for merely being pulled over for a traffic violation? He shouldn't; but that is what a segment of black Americans have brainwash the rest of blacks living in or coming to America with: outright lies regarding law enforcement encounters. POC are to fear the police. To fear white people. And yet statistically, black males kill (murder) more whites (and police officers) every single year than vice versa. This is one example for the year 2019, and it is about the same every year before and after. Blacks kill more than twice as many whites as whites killed blacks. And intraracial violence among blacks is 2x as deadly given the fact that blacks are less than 14% of the population compared to 70% of whites. If anyone needs to fear anyone in this country, it is whites needing to fear black men. Black men who are 18.5x more likely to shoot and kill law enforcement officers than law enforcement officers being 2.5x more likely to shoot blacks, but not always necessarily killing them. Violent black boys/men are the problem in America, not whites, not law enforcement officers. That is just a fact, an inconvenient truth that black Americans, rich or poor, are in denial thereof. And it is all due to black culture. Until black Americans and black immigrants stop buying into the racial snake oil victimhood mentality being peddled and sold by #grifters like #BenjaminCrump, #JoyAnnReid, #DonLemon, #AlSharpton, #JesseJackson and liberal white boy #ShaunKing, among so many others, blacks will continue to face an uphill battle never before faced since the 1960s and civil rights. It also does not help when the lunatic left is pushing the incendiary version of Critical Race Theory upon children without appreciating the dangers it imposes. - Voddie Baucham Jr. Sounds Off on CRT: ‘Demonic Ideology’

According to Justice Clarence Thomas, the next issue(s) to be taken up and corrected by SCOTUS should be gay marriage, contraception and sodomy. I would also add the case that created protections that were NOT written thereof in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, transgender rights. For far too long the Justices have read into (i.e., legislated from the bench) the Amendments in order to create rights that are not explicitly written thereof. Justice Thomas is correct. Gay marriage, contraception, sodomy and transgender rights are NOT written into the US Constitution, and those gross errors of case precedence needs to be reversed and corrected. "Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for a 6-to-3 majority of the court, said that while the Civil Rights Act doesn't specifically mention the rights of homosexuals or transgender individuals, that law was written broadly enough to demand they be protected from discrimination in employment matters such as hiring, firing, pay and promotion." No, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was not written "broadly enough" to add factors that simply did not exist. It was very, very specific, not broad. "...outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin." In 1964, sex meant a biological man and a biological woman. Nothing else. Not gays. Not transgenders. Just a biological man and a biological woman. Below is NOT a biological woman. What Justice Gorsuch did was read into the statute without taking the legislative history into account, which is precisely what they are supposed to do. He failed, epically, to uphold his responsibility in that process of judicial review. He took nothing of factual history surrounding transgenderism into account where that 1964 Act is concerned. He failed. The Court failed. Transgenders are NOT protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Controversial pundit from the Daily Wire, Matt Walsh, has created a well written and produced documentary entitled, "What is a Woman?" And it is causing quite the stir among snowflakes and liberal whiners. Especially the interviews done on the Dr. Phil Show between Walsh and a couple other, well, guests. "What is a Woman?" is the documentary of our age. It addresses a reality that most refuse to accept. People who cannot handle the truth simply cannot handle the fact that their illusions are not actual reality. So, they deny truth, and charge truthsayers as bigots. Typical intellectual cowardice and a fine example of the Dunning Kruger Effect in action. It simply does not matter how hard liberals push, or their successes in getting others to become "woke," it simply will not change the FACT that less than 0.5% of the population in this country just will not accept men thinking they are women, women thinking they are men. In fact, the world over just will not accept the indoctrination of children into the homosexual and transgender agenda either. The latest Disney Buzz Lightyear movie has been an utter failure because of a same-sex kiss depicted within the animated movie. Normal heterosexual men and women are getting sick and tired of sexualizing children in today's liberal climate of "grooming." Over the past couple years there have been unrelenting efforts to "groom" children sexually, and in doing so, they become psychologically damaged adults. Ineffective as emotionally and intellectually intelligent free-thinking individuals that will be productive members of society. Rather, they will be born and bred democrats voting for them without a thought of what it will do to them in the future. Fact is, to destroy a populace, a county, is to destroy the adults as children before they become adults. It makes invasion easier for stronger countries who would destroy said country they hate. As of late, America has been producing pussies. Too many in fact. America is the last greatest country, and if we fail, if we fall...no country is going to air drop food, medical supplies and weapons. No one. As such, there will be no other place to escape to; precisely because there is no other country in this world that is freer or more secure than America. But because America is free, too many within this country take their freedoms for granted. And it is precisely that reason this country is failing. Evidence of this? Everything that has happened since George Floyd overdosed on Fentanyl blamed on a knee on the base of the neck (that no one can proved caused his death) of a black criminal who wanted to be on the ground in the first place. Now statues are erected of him, and police are castigated. America is doomed. Promoting the grooming and sexualization of children Promoting the grooming and sexualization of children (different publicist) Push to sexualize children is getting bolder and enjoys powerful tactical support Sexualization, Pornography, and Grooming in Schools The Left's Urgent Mission to Sexualization of Children *** Work in Progress ***

Shaun King Benjamin Crump Al Sharpton Jesse Jackson These are but a few names of anti-white & anti-law enforcement race baiting grifters concocting false narratives to drive their divisive narratives purely for money. First and foremost is Shaun King, a white man who claims to be half black by throwing his mother under the bus with accusations of her having an affair with a "light skinned black man." Yet his birth certificate, and family photos, show him to be nothing but a Caucasian male. Even his own family members affirm he is white. His real name is "Jeffrey Shaun King," but he dropped the Jeffrey to make his name sound more, well, I don't know. It doesn't make his name sound anymore "black," or African, that's for sure. Jeffrey has a litany of false narratives, false accusations, and insurmountable lies about his motives, failed business ventures and finances under his belt. Two of the most egregious false narratives/accusations he has made involve a little black girl murdered in crossfire at a Wal-Mart parking lot, and a Texas State Trooper being accused of kidnapping and rape of a black woman. Shaun King's lies lead to a bittersweet end for both the man he falsely accused and the actual shooters; afterwards Shaun dropped the story like a nuclear potato. Bitter for the man he falsely accused, and sweet for the actual two black men who shot and killed Jazmine. Shaun King and the Surprising End Result of the Jazmine Barnes Investigation Man, who Shaun King Falsely Accused of shooting Jazmine Barnes commits Suicide Then there is the innocent Texas State Trooper that he pushed, and pushed hard, the false narrative that Sharita Dixon-Cole was kidnapped and raped by that Trooper. King pushed so hard that it even brought infamous civil rights attorney Lee Merrit into the fray. And it wasn't enough that Shaun King falsely accused the Trooper of the crimes Sherita claimed, but another trooper in the same state with a similar name faced death threats over the case. A fact all too common with fallacious claims put forth by Shaun King. But where Lee Merritt apologizes for the fallacious claims, Shaun King claims to be a victim in the matter. A total intellectual coward move on his part, but what else is new. Jeffrey is, by definition, an intellectual coward. What makes the Sherita Dixon-Cole case even more absurd is the fact that she will escape any charges. That is, by definition, #blackprivilege. But before Sherita there was Crystal Magnum, the infamous stripper who falsely accused five members of a Durham/Raleigh, NC LaCrosse team of raping her at a Frat Party. Al Sharpton came to her defense, and Jesse Jackson paid for her future education. Low and behold, she got off on all false (criminal) charges only to end up stabbing her own boyfriend and going to jail. The following is a litany of negative press, believable accusations, and substantiated allegations against #FRAUD Jeffrey "Shaun" King: Black Twitter calls out Shaun King after he deactivates his social media accounts Shaun King Say's He is Moving out of His Swanky $840k House After Fraud Allegations A community word about Shaun King #SitDownShaun The Shaun King We're Not Talking About Shaun King threatens to sue activists who accuse him on Twitter of mishandling fundraisers An Open Letter from former Directors of Justice Together Where did all the money Shaun King raised for Black Lives Matter Go? Friend, Foe or Fraud? Shaun King on the Accusations Against Him, Rihanna's Diamond Ball, DeRay and More Shaun King aka Tom Fraud Announces New Clothing Line, Twitter Astounded by his Alleged Scamming Shuan King comes under financial scrutiny over botched news organizations Leftist Fraud Shaun King Praises Antifa Firebomber, Calls for More Violence 'Calvin Crime': Black Twitter Rips Shaun King After Begging for Money for New Fashion Line Shaun King Slammed for pushing woman's now-discredited claim trooper sexually assaulted her Shaun King Ruins Innocent Cop's Life Then Claims He is the Real Victim Shaun King Keeps Raising Money, and Questions About Where it Goes Twitter takes aim at Shaun King for not fulfilling promises Shaun King labeled a 'fraud' for allegedly stealing documentarian's Declaration of Independence tweet Shaun King slammed for 'scam' coronavirus fundraiser after targeting Hawaii Senator over Medicare Shaun King Threatens to Sue Black Activist Clarissa Brooks Over Deleted Tweet Proof that Shaun King's Clothing Brand is a Scam Second race baiting anti-white & anti-law enforcement charlatan is Benjamin Crump. A civil rights attorney who makes millions off the misery of alleged black victims while making false allegations against white people, law enforcement and the criminal justice system. One of his biggest supporters is, none other than MSNBC #racist Joy Ann Reid and liberal pundit Elie Mystal. Ben Crump is just another profiteer like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, without question. Nevertheless, Crump is just another evil black profiteer like the founders of BLM, he makes his money off the misery of those he claims to defend. Gets rich off their misery and lives a lavish lifestyle at their expense. Ben Crump is an Ambulance chaser of any incident where a black person is a victim. Even if he exploits those victims for his own gain, which is typical of those professing to be saviors of blacks in America. Sad, but it is an all too common tragic tale of black Americans where one takes advantage over another for personal gain. Like Shaun King, Crump denies, refuses to acknowledge, and epically fails to address any transgression against a black victim when the perpetrator is black. When it comes to white victims by black perpetrators, he triples down on that denial, refusal and failure to address that transgression. There is no money in it. No fifteen minutes of fame. And when a black person is shot and/or killed by a law enforcement officer but there is evidence that the person shot provoked that response, Crump, a non-trained criminal attorney, but more importantly a non-trained law enforcement officer, just simply creates fictions about the officer's actions conveniently leaving out what the black suspect did leading up to being shot, falsely accusing the officer of illegal acts that go against department policy and the law. Benjamin Crump: A Legacy of Lies and Racial Division Ben Crump is the most Dangerous Man in America - a Man who is Destructive through his Lies Benjamin Crump - Attorney and Manipulative Liar ... The Modern Al Sharpton Candace Owens: Attorney Ben Crump is a Race Hustler like Sharpton, Jackson Florida Civil Rights Attorney Ben Crump Falsely Claims Columbus Shooting Victim was Unarmed Benjamin Crump is an Agent and a Fraud (language warning) The Abysmal Record of Benjamin Crump Cop shot by Breanna Taylor's boyfriend blasts 'grimy' attorney Ben Crump in new book Ben Crump's Race Riots are Just getting Started Finally, when it comes to Al Sharpton and Jesse "Shakedown" Jackson, no words are necessary. It is above and beyond common knowledge the depth of their race baiting and charlatan grifting ways of making money off those they profess to defend and protect. Neither have made any significant positive impact to and for the black community. None. Al Sharpton is a Huge Fraud Al Sharpton's Rap Sheet Al Sharpton, Civil Rights Fraud Stores that pay Al Sharpton Hush Money MSM Continues to Cover up Al Sharpton's Racism, Homophobia, Misogyny, and Antisemitism Al Sharpton is a Race Man and a Fraud Al Sharpton's Ugly History of Opportunism and Bigotry What is Al Sharpton's Net Worth? Shakedown King Jesse Jackson Quacks Up Why Martin Luther King Distrusted Jesse Jackson Take that Sharpton! Jesse shakes down INTEL Jesse Jackson's ties to terrorists exposed Unmasking Jesse Jackson Jesse Jackson Says Organization Will Pay Alleged Rape Victim's Tuition (Crystal Magnum) I could go on and on with fact-based truths about both #fraud Al Sharpton and #shakedownartist Jesse Jackson. But again, their litany of race baiting to enrich their own lives is well known and common knowledge. Taking their place present day is Benjamin Crump and Jeffrey King passing himself off as biracial when he is 100% Caucasian. Both #grifters taking millions off the misery of alleged black victims.

DiAngelo kicks this chapter off with one of the most incredibly ridiculous statements: "But systems of oppression are deeply rooted and not overcome with the simple passage of legislation." This idea, that "legislation" is the cure all for the ills of the world, is wholeheartedly misguided. No amount, strength, or reach of so-called legislation can or ever will change any level of "oppression" as such oppression is rooted in human behavior. Laws cannot change human behavior directly, but if carefully crafted they can change them indirectly. But this is for another blog, not this one. "One line of King's speech in particular -- that one day he might be judged by the content of his character and not the color of his skin -- was seized upon by the white public because the words were seen to provide a simple and immediate solution to racial tensions: pretend that we don't see race, and racism will end." False equivalency fallacy. Focusing on the inherent positive attributes of an individual that they have to offer to better their lives and the lives of others through their employment is in no way shape or for a way for white people to "pretend that we don't see race, and racism will end." This gives credence to the saying one can be so educated and smart but yet be so damn utterly stupid. DiAngelo then makes this spurious claim: "... a common response in the name of color blindness is to declare that an individual who says that race matters is the one who is racist. In other words, it is racist to acknowledge race." Context matters. So yeah, depending on the context in which one acknowledges race it can in fact be racist. That's not rocket science, that's common sense. Well, at least for the literate and educated. "While the idea of color blindness may have started out as a well-intentioned strategy for interupting racism, in practice it has served to deny the reality of racism and this hold it in place." Color blindness was the goal, not the strategy. The end result was to see everyone as equals and focus on merit and not skin color. It is to white guilt liberals and black democrats that kept racism alive, especially the race hustlers like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and militant blacks like Louis Farrakhan and the Black Panthers. They were the ones truly resistant to change and wanted nothing to do with a color-blind society. They needed to keep fanning the flames in order to make money for themselves off the misery of those they claim to represent. "Racial bias is largely unconscious, and herein lies the deepest challenge - the defensiveness that ensues upon any suggestion of racial bias." We are all born empty slates, racism is taught not inbred. Like all stereotypes, biases, defense mechanisms, etc., the innate survival mechanism determines what is a threat and what is not. Personal experience. Vicarious experience. Academic experience. Professional experience. All, some or parts inform us through one measure of experience what is and what is not a danger to our survival. And when half the black male population commits over 50% of the entire US populations violent person crimes (e.g., murder, non-negligent manslaughter, robberies, rape, etc.), it is perfectly logical and understandable to fear black men. Even Jesse Jackson was famously quoted fearing for his life when he heard footsteps behind him on a street, only to feel relief when he turned around and saw it was a group of white people. If a race hustler like Jackson can feel fear from other blacks, that alone speaks volumes about this problem that has nothing to do with any racist bias but a reality bias for self-preservation. "Research in implicit bias has shown that perceptions of criminal activity are influenced by race." "White people will perceive danger simply by the presence of black people; we cannot trust our perceptions when it comes to race and crime." "Racist images and resultant white fears can be found at all levels of society, and myriad studies demonstrate that whites believe that people of color (and blacks in particular) are dangerous." No, fact-based data regarding the demographics of offenders is what influences the perceptions of criminal activity based on race. As aforementioned, black males, that is half the black male population in the United States (approximately 3% of their 6% of the total 14% black population) commits over 50% of the entire nation's violent person crimes (e.g., murder, non-negligent manslaughter, robberies, rape, etc.). But more than that, personal experience as victims of crime, black or white, substantiates that bias. Especially given the fact that intraracial violence is nothing short of an epidemic in inner city black communities. Blacks in this country are violent, and they cause a disproportionate amount of both violent person and property crime in this country. The recent summer #BurnLootMurder riots of 2020 prove that, in addition to any and all race-based riots from Rodney King forward. Such race-based riots simply do not happen when white people are victims of either black murderers like this (every year blacks kill more whites than vice versa), or by cops. And a recent Washington State University study has proven that law enforcement are less likely to pull the trigger on a black suspect than they are white or Hispanic suspects. "Whites rarely consider how sheltered and safe their spaces may be from the perspective of people of color (e.g., Trayvon Martin's experience in a gated white community). Because it reverses the actual direction of racial danger, this narrative may be one of the most pernicious." Yeah so sheltered that many, and I mean many blacks leave the inner city (i.e., hood) and move into predominately white neighborhoods because they want to be subjugated to that reversal "direction of racial danger." I am sure that that is exactly what #grifter #fraud #charlatan #BurnLootMurder founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors thought when she bought million dollar homes among whites and the rich and famous. Give me a break, DiAngelo. "We believe we are superior at a deeply internalized level and act on this belief in the practice of our lives, but we must deny this belief to fit into society and maintain our self-identity as good, moral people." It does not matter what I, you, we, them or anyone "believes," feels, or thinks. The only thing that matters is what can be proven. Your subjective spurious claims cannot be proven on the scale that you infer them. Fact is, a history of personal and vicarious experience (i.e., through reported data obtained through research) is what is used to prove that some races are simply just smarter and better than others. Asians being at the top of that list, and blacks and other people of color at the bottom of that list. This reality has nothing to do with racism, a "belief" that one race is superior to another, it is a fact proven by the data. The various races have simply tested academically, and professionally, differently from the other. While there are obvious exception to the rule, those exceptions are not the rule. "To understand how white people become so difficult in conversations about race, we need to understand the underlying foundation of white fragility; how being white shapes our perspectives, experiences and responses." There is no such thing as white fragility, let's get that clear. That is a made-up term spawned from white guilt liberals such as DiAngelo. Every child, regardless of any demographic background, is born a blank slate. Racism is learned, just like anything and everything else in interactive social life of human societies. It is not an innate factor of being a human being. But through constant bombardment of suttle and overt messages indoctrinating children, they learn to become what those messages are designed to illicit. "... whiteness has psychological advantages that translate into material return." No, it does not. People, regardless of background, have to earn their way in life, and they only get out of it what they put into it. Period. Justice Clarence Thomas, Dr. Ben Carson, John McWhorter, Thomas Sowell, Denzel Washington, Morgan Freeman, former Officer Brandon Tatum, and so many others prove this salient fact of life. It is the victimhood mentality that creates barriers to the material returns in life, not whiteness or blackness. "Another way that life has been shaped by being white is that my race is held up as the norm for humanity." Whiteness, or Caucasians are not the norm for humanity. What is the norm include but are not limited to integrity, honesty, loyalty, law abiding, hardworking, and all the other like-positive attributes of humanity. How one chooses to live their life is on them and it has nothing to do with whiteness, blackness, or anything else other than individual desires to be good, bad or a little of both to their own self-serving ends. "Virtually any representation of human is based on white people's norms and images - 'flesh colored' makeup, standard emoji, depictions of Adam and Eve, Jesus and Mary, educational models of the human body with white skin and blue eyes." If black skin was the predominate color of human beings on this planet who have created new advancements and moved the world forward, then any representation of human would be based on black skin and brown eyes. Whatever or whomever is the dominates feature in any aspect of the world and our human existence will likewise be equally represented the norms and images put out for consumption. That is just a fact of life. "White solidarity requires both silence about anything that exposes the advantages of the white position and tacit agreement to remain racially united in the protection of white supremacy." Please. Replace white with black and it means the same thing. Every racial group has solidarity, and each has its own culture and heritage they are proud of. It is their individual and collective right to be who they are without worry of an outside group criticizing them for being who and what they are by race, heritage, culture and/or religion (if applicable). "Romanticized recollections of the past and calls for a return to former ways are a function of white privilege, which manifests itself in the ability to remain oblivious to our racial history." Really? So, whose idea was this: Then you have authors who have studied/researched and written about this: Neither of these realities have anything to do with white privilege but rather personal choice of the individual(s) involved. As of late, blacks and other people of color, but namely blacks are self-segregating themselves. They are being far more outspoken in the media, books, talk shows, pundits, etc. in open ways on par if not more so than what the Klu Klux Klan were. Joy-Ann Reid, Elie Mystal, Al Sharpton, Ben Crump, Louis Farrakhan, Nicole Hannah Jones, and so many more are exercising their #blackprivilege to be outwardly #racist towards #whites, #Asians, and anyone else not #black. Especially if they do not agree with their position(s), which definitely includes other blacks for whom they ascribe the label Uncle Tom, race traitor, coon, so on and so forth. "Claiming that the past was socially better than the present is also a hallmark of white supremacy." Are you kidding me!?! The past was socially better than the present, and none of it has to do with white supremacy. People were more respectful, kind, compassionate, honest, cooperative and exhibited all the other positive attributes of humanity. None of which is a hallmark of white supremacy, but rather our capacity to be "human." "The romanticized 'traditional' family values of the past are also racially problematic." Really? Before civil rights, black families maintained a nuclear family and the abortion rate was at or below 22%. Despite racism and Jim Crow, blacks were prosperous. The very first woman to become a millionaire in this country was a black female, Madam CJ Walker. The first renowned black doctor, Dr. James McCune Smith, worked hard and attained his position before slavery even ended. How did either one of them, or any successful black American throughout history ever achieve such success despite so many "racially problematic" obstacles? Faith. Motivation. Perseverance. Devotion. Integrity. More importantly, personal responsibility and accountability. "White flight may be seen as another aspect of white racial innocence, as it is often justified by beliefs that POC (again, especially blacks) are more prone to crime and that if "too many" black people move into a neighborhood, crime will increase, home values will go down, and the neighborhood will deteriorate." Truth to be told, this is about the only factually accurate statement DiAngelo makes in the entire book. And it isn't an issue or matter of belief, as it doesn't matter what one believes, feels or things but rather what can be proven. The historical data proves factually accurate that when blacks moved near or into better neighborhoods, they soon declined due to the criminality brought to it. It is the very reason or basis of the "broken windows" theory. Something that DiAngelo clearly knows nothing of seeing as she is neither a criminologist nor has had any experience in the field to know one way or the other. Hence her lack of an argument to substantiate her spurious anti-white position regarding her assertion. "For most whites, the percentage of young men of color in a neighborhood is directly correlated with perceptions of the neighborhood crime level." DiAngelo just does not speak for "most whites" or even a few whites; but regardless of that obvious fact, the criminological data affirms such a perception making it more of a reality that fantasy. The fact is and has been for decades that half the black male population in this country commits over 50% of the entire nation's violent person crimes. That's just a fact. There is no way around it. "Deeply held white associations of black people with crime distort reality and the actual direction of danger that has historically existed between whites and blacks." Crying (Wolf Syndrome) racism doesn't change the aforementioned fact either. It just screams your ignorance when you do so. After all it is precisely why Jesse Jackson was quoted as saying he is always relieved to turn around in a dark alley seeing a group of whites than blacks when hearing footsteps approaching him from behind. Whites are not prone to attack a black man walking alone, but a group of black men will most certainly do so. Which is precisely why intraracial violence within black communities is such a problem in inner cities. "It has been well documented that blacks and Latinos are stopped by police more often than whites are for the same activities and that they receive harsher sentences than whites do for the same crimes." Nothing like a non-criminologist opining on criminal justice matters she clearly has no comprehension thereof. Blacks and Hispanics commit a disproportionate amount of crime compared to whites; and they likewise have longer criminal histories than whites charged with the same crime. It is for that very reason, criminal history, that goes into implementing sentencing harsher for blacks and Hispanics because that is exactly what the sentencing guidelines dictate. Blacks and Hispanics are just far more violent than whites. US DOJ Statistics on Race and Ethnicity of Violent Crime Perpetrators "American police must face down armed violent criminals. That’s their job. Often those violent threats come from young, male, urban African Americans. As long as that is the case there will be violent confrontations between police and black civilians. Increasing the number of black police officers won’t change this. Nor will study commissions, police budget reductions, chokehold prohibitions, or the elimination of qualified immunity from civil suits, to mention a few of the proposals to curb police being bandied about. Some of these proposals may be wise, some not. But none will dramatically reduce the number of violent confrontations between police and African Americans." ~ The Facts on Race, Crime, and Policing in America "There is no doubt that African-American juveniles are more likely than Caucasian juveniles to be arrested for serious (index) violent offenses in the United States (homicide, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault)." ~ How can the relationship between race and violence be explained? I can go on and on and on citing study after study, fact after fact outlining just how blacks, black males specifically, are just more prone to violence and a problem for society despite being such a small percentage of the overall population. But the one thing that bothers me is the consistent erroneous citation that black Americans are 13% of the population committing X crimes. That just isn't the case. While black Americans are 13% of the US population, it is predominately black males committing the crimes. Not all black males, obviously, but statistically it is about half the black male population, which is 6%. That means roughly 3% (or less) of the black male population is committing more than half the heinous violent crimes in the United States and have been for decades. "Life in the United States is deeply shaped by racial segregation." That goes without saying, as all races have a natural proclivity to congregate together versus mingling together. That is both a fact and just human nature. Trying to make it into some "racist" narrative is counterintuitive and counterproductive to the realities of humanity. We all just associate with whom we choose to associate with. That's life. Like it or not, it is what it is. "Of all racial groups, whites are the most likely to choose segregation and are the group most likely to be in the social and economic position to do so." Psychology tells us that we all desire to congregate with those most like us. That's not segregation. That's choice. The same as blacks choosing to congregate with those most like them. As cited above, "why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria." "Meritocracy is a precious ideology of the United States, but neighborhoods and schools are demonstratably not equal, they are separate and unequal." "Tax bases, school resources, curricula, textbooks, opportunities for extracurricular activities, and the quality of the teaching staff differ widely between school districts." Not by design, but rather by circumstances of each district. Schools are placed in areas to service the nearby homes within that district. Schools that are built to service the inner-city districts lack funding precisely because the property taxes are relative to the value of the homes in those districts. Those homes have low values due to the fact that the neighborhoods are rundown and high in crime. No one can afford to fix up their homes in order to increase their value. No one will cooperate with law enforcement against those who trespass and commit crimes against thy neighbors. So, there is no interest by anyone, anywhere to improve these districts. As such, the county cannot increase the property taxes since the value of the homes do not support it. Without an increase in that primary source of funding, the inner-city schools suffer; that fact of reality has nothing to do with meritocracy, inequality and/or racism and everything to do with the residents (to include parents of kids attending those schools) just not caring about their home, their neighborhood and equally the very schools they depend on educating their children. Regarding districts that are predominately white having better funding, resources, etc., it goes without saying that the homes being assessed property taxes are of higher value because the owners take pride in not only their homes, but also in their neighborhoods and cooperate with law enforcement in order to keep crime down; thereby making their districts desirable places for others to live and move into. Again, none of that has anything to do with racism and everything to do with personal responsibility and accountability. Something of which the inner-city neighborhoods just lack, collectively and individually, making it tougher on themselves internally which affects them externally. DiAngelo then uses a quote from an African American scholar and filmmaker, Omowale Akintunde to support more of her nonsensical tripe: "Racism is a systemic, societal, institutional, omnipresent, and epistemologically embedded phenomenon that pervades every vestige of our reality." Racism is a part of our very existence as human beings, for there is no one group that does not feel more superior over another. So yes, racism is a part of our reality, but it doesn't have to be. Racism is learned, it is not intrinsic. Which is a salient point that scholar Thomas Sowell made regarding blacks who remained in Europe post WWII and had children. Those children grew up with their white counterparts and had absolutely no difference in IQ or educational success. The question then becomes what happened in America where there was a difference with blacks scoring lower and being less successful academically. Answer: Black Culture. "In a society in which race clearly matters, our race profoundly shapes us." Well of course it does due to the fact that the left, democrats and race hustlers make race the central theme of everyday life in America; and more often than not where it most definitely simply does not exist or needs to exist. "Those who claim to have been taught to treat everyone the same are simply telling me that they don't understand socialization." "... we wouldn't want to treat everyone the same because people have different needs and different relationships." OMG! When people say they have been taught to treat others the same as they themselves would like to be treated is about showing compassion, empathy, respect and kindness. It has nothing to do with "socialization" or kowtowing to the "different (personal) needs and different (personal) relationships" of others. Those matters are of a personal nature, in other words, personal responsibility and accountability. Outsiders have no say or play in those personal matters. "Many POC have told me that they initially tried to talk about racism with their white friends, but their friends get defensive or invalidated their experiences, so they stopped sharing their experiences." This anecdotal evidence without any real legitimate references or citations is meaningless. While I served in the US Army, I had a close relationship with a black soldier serving on the Drug Suppression Team under the Criminal Investigation Division. One day he came to my office and gleefully made his presence known, "What's up my Ni**er!!" I was shocked. I asked him, "What did you say!?!" He repeated himself and said it was "cool" cause we are friends. I candidly replied that while we were friends and colleagues, there was no way I would refer to him the same and I didn't want him doing it with me, as I had too much respect for him. He understood and appreciated it. Bottom line, whites do not get defensive or invalidate anything...that is an empty claim that simply cannot be proven by DiAngelo. She only asserts it because of its appeal to emotion and ignorance value. "While a white person may have been picked on - even mercilessly - by being in the numerical minority in a specific context, the individual was experiencing race prejudice and discrimination, not racism." Wow. Just wow. At this point, might as well ask DiAngelo, "What is a Woman?" She could no more answer that question than she can what the factually accurate definition of "racism" is. When a black man feels superior to a white man, that [is] racism. And that level of racism I experienced while serving in the US Army while stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. I know racism as a white male in this country. From both blacks, Hispanics and others. But I did not let it keep me down. No. Merit. I persevered. I succeeded in life and retired at the young age of 45. Not entirely by choice, more medically; but the choices I made in life made it possible for me to do so at that age. I took personal responsibility and accountability for my behaviors and choices, or rather didn't make piss poor choices by acting with bad behaviors. Most POC can and never will say the same. That's just a fact and has absolutely nothing to do with race. "While it isn't comfortable for most whites to talk about racism, we must do so if we want to challenge - rather than protect - racism." *Roll eyes* Whites do talk about racism and want to; but when they speak the truth, they are relentlessly crucified with the accusation of being "a racist." I know, as I deal with on a daily basis online, be it Twitter, Instagram or Facebook (among other social media sites). Truth is a cancer to those in utter ignorant denial of that truth. The social media platforms do not like the truth either. I have been kicked off Twitter three times, Instagram four times and Facebook two times. It is an utterly pathetic display of intellectual cowardice on their part. Each and every time it was because I cited fact based criminological data affirming that less than half the 6% population of black males were committing over 50% of the entire nation's murders and non-negligent manslaughters, in addition to being overrepresented in mass shootings as well. Fact. Truth. And I even appealed to Twitter and Instagram and was denied. Truth sounds like hate to those who hate the truth. "Racism is complex and nuanced, and its manifestations are not the same for every group of color." Naturally. Other groups of color do not focus on racism like black Americans do, especially the left, Democrats and race hustlers who make it their mission in life to "Cry Wolf" (racism) any and every chance they get. "Exploring our collective racial identity interrupts a key privilege of dominance - the ability to see oneself only as an individual. We need to discuss white people as a group - even if doing so jars us - in order to disrupt our unracialized identities." Being an individual is not dominance, it is individuality, the core of our humanity. As individuals we are responsible for our own individual actions, choices and behaviors. Sadly, the left, Democrats and race hustlers absolutely refuse to hold people of color to the exact same level of personal responsibility and accountability they do upon whites. They hold whites to a higher standard while keeping POC at a lower standard. It serves their interests. Personal financial interests, that is. "... I believe that in the white mind, black people are the ultimate racial "other," and we must grapple with this relationship, for it is a foundational aspect of the racial socialization underlying white fragility." And yet that was never the same interpretation, application, thought process or otherwise in Europe after WWII, as Thomas Sowell so eloquently factually describes. "... anti-blackness is foundational to our very identities as white people." "Whiteness has always been predicated on blackness." These two statements in and of themselves are purely racist. More than that, whiteness is no more predicated on blackness than blackness is predicated on whiteness. What all our lives are predicated on is life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness on an individual level. What is good for one, is not always good for another. Or enough for one, or another. We all have "individual" desires. Again, Thomas Sowell has made it clear through decades of research that race has nothing to do with any issues between the races. Many black people are posting videos on YouTube of their reactions to learning these facts. I encourage others to check them out. The following are but a few examples: https://youtu.be/wuhYEsxDTlA https://youtu.be/XzxLk6iEWQI https://youtu.be/1MMAMlvepZw "Affirmative Action is a tool to ensure that qualified minority applicants are given the same employment opportunities as white people." This is patently false. Affirmative Action was designed to give a leg up to minorities. A leg up that did not account for their deficiencies in academics and/or professional experiences. The Ricci v. DeStefano case is a clear-cut case of reverse discrimination. "A 2015 study by the American Sociological Foundation found that the highest level of segregation is between black and whites, the lowest is between Asians and whites, and the level between Latinx and whites occupies an intermediate position. A majority of whites, in both the expression of their beliefs and the practice of their lives, do not want to integrate with blacks." The relationship between blacks and whites is far more contentious than the relationship between Asians and whites. Blacks harbor unsubstantiated paranoia about whites due to their inability to acknowledge let alone accept personal responsibility and accountability. As such, it draws deep resentment that results in blacks with their psychological projection of their problems and failures onto whites. A fact that remains true today. "We see anti-black sentiment in how quickly images of brutality towards black children (let alone black adults) are justified by the white assumption that it must have been deserved." Strawman Fallacy! Studies have shown time and again that behavioral issues with black children have been the cause of their punishment, NOT "brutality." "Thus, white identity depends in particular on the projection of inferiority onto blacks and the oppression this inferior status justifies for the white collective" "To put it bluntly, I believe that the white collective fundamentally hates blackness for what it reminds us of: that we are capable and guilty of perpetuating harm that our gains come through the subjugation of others." Cleary DiAngelo hasn't read let alone consulted The Bell Curve, which was a well-researched book on intelligence quotients. People of color, namely blacks, score lower on the academic scale. So, it is impossible for whites to "project" inferiority onto blacks, since blacks, in general, are less educated than whites and Asians. "We see it in the outrage of the crowd of white progressives who showed up to hear Bernie Sanders speak in Seattle and were asked by black activists to grant four and a half minutes of silence to honor Michael Brown..." Michael Brown? Really? He was a thug. He committed a strong-armed robbery of a convenience store for cigars, and then attacked a police officer who politely asked him to walk on the sidewalk versus the middle of the street. During the fight he tried to get the officer's service weapon. Michael Brown reaped what he sowed. And good riddance. Even the so-called "white progressives" (i.e. - white liberals) knew Brown was a POS not worth mentioning, let alone "honoring." "White racial socializations engenders many conflicting feelings toward African-Americans: benevolence, resentment, superiority, hatred, and guilt roil barely below the surface and erupt at the slightest breach, yet never be explicitly acknowledged." Um, the exact same thing can be said for blacks who self-segregate for this exact reason(s). This statement is one of pure #hypocrisy. "Most white people have limited information about what racism is and how it works." Clearly DiAngelo has never heard of the dictionary. Definition of racism 1: a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race The rest of her book is pure garbage. I can go on and on and on dispelling her nonsensical positions and fallacious accusations against white people. Especially since it all comes from a white woman. A white guilt liberal woman, no less. * This Blog Entry is a work in progress, as time allows.

ANTIFA, BLM, Grooming LGBTQ+ all = the destruction of American Society This is but a small sampling of the liberals who wreak havoc upon innocent citizens across the country. These clowns were arrested in Portland, Oregon...no surprise. Liberals firebomb abortion clinics that provide a valuable service to the women of America. Mad Maxine Waters encourages (incites) a crowd of liberal democrats to confront, get in the face and harass conservatives and/or republicans. Liberals are purposely demonizing, intimidating and persecuting people whose politics they disagree with. They are inciting violence. And this is no joke: They are going to get someone killed. Whether it’s a Republican politician, or an ICE agent, or just a conservative in the wrong place, at the wrong time, wearing a red Trump MAGA hat. As sure as I’m sitting here, someone is going to kill a conservative based on this violent rhetoric. - Gem State Patriot News Even a Muslim cannot believe liberals and leftists in this country ~by Majid Rafizadeh 25 Reasons to dislike Liberals The most miserable cities are all liberal cities Liberal Terrorist arrested for threatening life of sitting Representative Boebert The obvious Ten Liberal Agendas Destroying America. 1. Socialism. The never-ending quest by Leftists to destroy Capitalism and America. 2. Subjugation of National Defense to the UN. Leftist push for globalism without boundaries or national identity. 3. Homosexuality. The need for the Left to destroy the underpinnings of marriage and civilization. 4. Support for Dictatorships. America's enemies are the friends of the Left. 5. Gun Control. In a Leftist regime only the politburo members will be allowed to own guns..., for self-defense. 6. Abortion. The urgent need of the Left to destroy Christian teaching, defile God and the concept of Life. 7. Religious persecution. The need for the Left to destroy Christianity while praising Islam and other violent "religions." 8. Welfare and Entitlements. How the Left has kept the lowly Black in servitude, beholden to their Democrat masses. 9. Judicial Activism. No need to pass laws when Leftist judges can make up their own any time they want. 10. Political Correctness. The method the Left uses to silence free speech in America. 7 Reasons why Liberals are incapable of understanding the world 6 Ways Liberals are Destroying America and American Culture Truth of liberal LGBTQ+ Agenda 30% of Young Liberals Identify as LGBTQ+ The Absurdity of Liberal Democracy Why Liberals are so Obsessed with Racism, Homosexuality, and Transsexualism The Liberal Gay Agenda Blueprint Biden's LGBT agenda, is Pedophilia next?? Liberal Extremist Terrorist Plows through Crowd "Jane's Revenge" - Liberal Terrorists Claimed Responsibility for Wisconsin Fire Bombing